State of the Union speech –Andrew Jackson Source: Andrew Jackson, State of the Union speech. December 6, 1830. The present policy of the Government is but a continuation of the same progressive change by a milder process. The tribes which occupied the countries now constituting the Eastern States were annihilated or have melted away to make room for the whites. The waves of population and civilization are rolling to the westward, and we now propose to acquire the countries occupied by the red men of the South and West by a fair exchange, and, at the expense of the United States, to send them to a land where their existence may be prolonged and perhaps made perpetual. Doubtless it will be painful to leave the graves of their fathers; but what do they more than our ancestors did or than our children are now doing?.... Can it be cruel in this Government when, by events which it can not control, the Indian is made discontented in his ancient home to purchase his lands, to give him a new and extensive territory, to pay the expense of his removal, and support him a year in his new abode? How many thousands of our own people would gladly embrace the opportunity of removing to the West on such conditions! If the offers made to the Indians were extended to them, they would be hailed with gratitude and joy.... Rightly considered, the policy of the General Government toward the red man is not only liberal, but generous. He is unwilling to submit to the laws of the States and mingle with their population. To save him from this alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation, the General Government kindly offers him a new home, and proposes to pay the whole expense of his removal and settlement. It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly 30 years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation. Two important tribes have accepted the provision made for their removal at the last session of Congress, and it is believed that their example will induce the remaining tribes also to seek the same obvious advantages.... Humanity has often wept over the fate of the aborigines of this country, and Philanthropy has been long busily employed in devising means to avert it, but its progress has never for a moment been arrested, and one by one have many powerful tribes disappeared from the earth. To follow to the tomb the last of his race and to tread on the graves of extinct nations excite melancholy reflections. But true philanthropy reconciles the mind to these vicissitudes as it does to the extinction of one generation to make room for another.... Philanthropy could not wish to see this continent restored to the condition in which it was found by our forefathers. What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and ranged by a few thousand savages to our extensive Republic, studded with cities, towns, and prosperous farms, embellished with all the improvements which art can devise or industry execute, occupied by more than 12;000;000 happy people, and filled with all the blessings of liberty, civilization, and religion?....
Questions:
1. Close Reading: Why would he say, “Humanity has often wept over the fate of the aborigines of this country,” if he supports Indian Removal?
2. Close Reading: Why does Jackson think the United States was better in 1830 than in 1609?
3. Close Reading: Why does Jackson think his policy is kind and generous? Do you agree?
Answers
Related Questions
How much does a royal navy captain earn?
Explain the possible downsides of living in any of these ancient times
While waiting at a bus stop, Jacinta looked up and noticed that she could not see the mountains because of a thick layer of smog. Where does Jacinta most likely live? the Yucatán Panama near Lake Nicaragua Mexico City
The first two-thirds of the twentieth century was dominated by the _____ and _____ perspectives in psychology. Please choose the correct answer from the following choices, and then select the submit answer button.
Answers
Answers
Answers
Answers
Final answer:
American settlers reacted to Native Americans on the Great Plains primarily with fear and aggression, leading to conflict. Due to economic motivations and a culture-clash, settlers often forcibly removed Native Americans from their lands. Policies such as the First Treaty of Fort Laramie and the Indian Removal Act of 1830 facilitated this displacement, eventually sparking the Indian Wars.
Explanation:
As American settlers pushed westward, they inevitably came into conflict with the Native tribes that had long inhabited the Great Plains. The influx of settlers was due, in part, to the popular misconception in the East of the West as a vast and empty land, along with legislations such as the Indian Removal Act of 1830 that led to forcible displacement of Native tribes to make way for expansion.
Specifically, settlers often reacted to Native Americans with fear and aggression. They sought to claim the land for economic purposes like farming, mining, and cattle ranching. When native tribes were perceived as obstacles to these endeavors, they were often dealt with through negotiation of treaties that relocated them or simply through acts of violence. An example of such a treaty is the First Treaty of Fort Laramie in 1851, which sought to move the tribes out of the path of the settlers. However, the agreement quickly broke down due to noncompliance and corruption. Consequently, many Native American tribes were left destitute or forcefully removed from their lands.
These actions sparked the Indian Wars of the 1870s and 1880s, causing a significant transformation in the lifestyle and culture of Native American tribes. Ultimately, despite occasional native military victories, the settlers supported by local and federal government were successful in claiming the desired land, altering the landscape of the American Indian way of life fundamentally.
Learn more about Settlers' reaction to Native Americans on the Great Plains here:
#SPJ12
B)He championed legislation that expanded America’s welfare system.
C)He authorized laws that helped farmers regain control of commodity prices.
D)He helped broker a trade agreement that assisted struggling economies abroad.
Answers
A) successfully managed the distribution of food to Allied nations throughout World War I. He was largely successful in handing out humanitarian aid in war-time Belgium. He wanted to make it his goal to feed all of Belgium during the war period and actually was able to do this, along with giving many Belgians clothes and cash which was well distributed among the population and never reached the hands of the Germans.
Answers
In the United States, the seats in the House of Representatives are apportioned in accordance with the population of each state, which is modified every 10 years when the U.S. Census is made. However, each state is guarantee at least one member.
Currently, the state that has more representatives is California, with 53 members, and the states that have only one representative are Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming.
Final answer:
Seats in the House of Representatives are divided based on the population of each state as determined by the national census. Each state is guaranteed at least one representative, with the remaining seats divided in accordance to population size.
Explanation:
Seats in the House of Representatives are apportioned based on the population of each state. This is determined by the national census conducted every 10 years. Each state is guaranteed at least one representative, but the remaining seats (out of the 435 total) are divided among the states in proportion to their population. This method of apportionment is known as the Method of Equal Proportions. So, states with larger populations have more representatives in the House than states with smaller populations.
Learn more about House of Representatives here:
#SPJ6