Kant's issue with Hume does not have to do with what Hume didn't say. Therefore, it is false.
Kant's problem with Hume stems more from the fact that Kant believes what Hume didn't say to be incorrect. Kant and Hume did not always see eye to eye, but when they did, their debates focused mostly on the nature of knowledge and reasoning.
Kant was critical of both Hume's scepticism and his notion that knowledge is restricted to what can be perceived by our senses. Kant argued that knowledge extends beyond this. Kant maintained that there is such a thing as innate knowledge and that reason plays an important part in comprehending the universe.
#SPJ11
FALSE.
Kant's issue with Hume does not have more to do with what Hume didn't say. In fact, Kant's criticism of Hume's philosophy is primarily focused on what Hume did say. Kant disagreed with Hume's skeptical approach to knowledge and causality. Hume argued that knowledge is based solely on sensory experience and that causality is merely a habit of the mind. Kant, on the other hand, believed that knowledge is a combination of sensory experience and innate concepts of the mind. He argued that causality is a necessary condition for our understanding of the world.
Kant's critique of Hume centers around these fundamental differences in their philosophies. He sought to reconcile Hume's empiricism with his own rationalism, ultimately proposing a synthetic approach to knowledge that combined both empirical observation and a priori concepts. Thus, Kant's issue with Hume is not about what Hume didn't say, but rather about the fundamental disagreements in their respective theories of knowledge and causality.
b. write about patriotic subjects
c. fight for a better world
d. focus on a single important issue in every book
This question is apparently incomplete as it has no options available, anyway I will give you an explanation so you can understand the concept.
Answer:
When something is summarized or important information is given briefly you can say it has been synthesized.
Explanation:
A summary is an abbreviated, concise and faithful exposition about the most important points of a text or document. As such, it can be done orally or in writing, and must be objective, clear and consistent.
The summary, in this sense, is a synthesis technique by means of which we take a text to its most essential expression, pointing out the most important ideas and the most relevant aspects of the subject, without the mediation of interpretations or critical positions. Its main objective is to make it easier for the reader to understand a text.
Heroes antagonize enemy cultures.
Heroes tend to be based on archetypes.
Heroes have flaws they must overcome to defeat the monster.
Answer:
The answer is: Heroes tend to be based on archetypes. Epic Heroes tend to embody specific ideas and notions such as strength, perseverance, morality etc. The reality of these heroes is that they often come through struggles to achieve promise or greatness, and they are meant to inspire the readers to embody those same ideals or archetypes. Hope this helps. Let me know if you need additional help!
Explanation:
a. crops
b. fields
c. plant
d. farmers
Answer:
a. Crops
Explanation:
Crops is the Direct Object or DO because it can't replace or describe the noun.
syntax
tone
lines