Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, that is correct. To seek redress in a court means to file a lawsuit against someone or something in order to obtain a legal remedy for a wrong that has been done to you. The remedy that you are seeking could be monetary damages, an injunction, or some other form of relief.
Courts are the primary means of seeking redress for legal claims in most countries. If you believe that you have been wronged in some way, you may be able to file a lawsuit against the person or entity that you believe is responsible. In order to be successful in your lawsuit, you will need to prove that you have a valid legal claim and that the defendant is liable for your damages.
If you are considering seeking redress in a court, it is important to consult with an experienced attorney. An attorney can help you to assess the strength of your case, develop a legal strategy, and file the necessary paperwork.
Here are some examples of situations where you might seek redress in a court:
You were injured in a car accident caused by a negligent driver.
You were discriminated against at work or in housing because of your race, gender, or other protected characteristic.
You were defrauded by a company or individual.
You suffered a product liability injury from a defective product.
You were the victim of a medical malpractice error.
If you believe that you have been wronged in some way, and you are considering seeking redress in a court, it is important to remember that the legal process can be complex and time-consuming. However, it can also be a way to obtain justice and compensation for the harm that you have suffered.
The phrase 'seek redress in court' pertains to obtaining satisfaction for a legal claim, which could be monetary compensation for damages. This concept operates within both civil law systems, where court cases are investigations fitting facts into existing legal codes and common law systems, focused on an adversarial judicial where one party is against the other.
Seeking redress in a court, a term often used in law, refers to the act of seeking satisfaction for a legal claim, potentially in the form of payment for damages. This tenet is an integral part of civil law systems and common law systems, each possessing its unique structural and procedural elements.
In civil law systems prevalent across most of Europe and South America, court cases are investigations centered around how facts fit into the previously established codes that apply to the specific matter. The courts in these systems have specific jurisdiction over certain types of codes. The comprehensive legal codes contain all the laws for a country, and case law or judicial decisions, while important, are secondary to these codes and serve to offer pertinent advisory to clients.
Conversely, the common law system, employed across many English-speaking countries, centralizes on an adversarial judicial system where one party is pitted against the other. It is left to an unbiased party, such as a judge or jury, to decide which party prevails. For instance, consider a company wrongfully terminates an employee’s contract; the employee could 'seek redress' and may be granted compensation if the judge or jury finds in their favor.
#SPJ2
B. Social attitudes
C. Supply
D. Government laws
Why do union contracts protect workers who have seniority?
A. Older workers have more voting power in unions; they vote to protect themselves.
B. Unions tend to support older members because they pay more in union dues.
C. United States law forces unions to consider seniority in collective bargaining.
D. Businesses are more likely to fire older, higher-paid workers. Seniority rules protect older workers.
Why is it a bad idea to simply hide money in a safe place as a way to save?
A. Money disintegrates over time.
B. The money will gain value over time through deflation.
C. You're likely to forget where the money is hidden.
D. The money will lose value over time through inflation.
When a bank evaluates a person for a loan, what does the word "capacity" refer to?
A. The ability to make payments on time
B. Property that can be pledged to protect the lender
C. The willingness to repay debts
D. The amount of the loan in question
Answer:
Prejudice would be an example of what factor affecting wages?
Why do union contracts protect workers who have seniority?
Why is it a bad idea to simply hide money in a safe place as a way to save?
When a bank evaluates a person for a loan, what does the word "capacity" refer to?
Explanation:
A prejudice is a negative thought that someone emits about a person, thing or situation without having true knowledge about it. This attitude is a sign of rejection. Part of the existence of prejudices and the willingness of employers to reduce their income and profits in order to satisfy these prejudices. In this way, the existence of a majority and a minor group is assumed, which receives comparatively lower remunerations. This is because entrepreneurs have prejudices about specific characteristics of the minority group, specific to gender or ethnicity.
Employment seniority is taken into account for many situations in labor relations, among which are (Compensation for dismissal, Seniority plus, Promotions, Holiday choice, Order for dismissals, among others).
There is inflation when the prices of the set of goods and services in an economy increase steadily. That is, when the average price of all goods and services in a country goes up. The rise in prices causes the loss of purchasing power of citizens. Or put another way, if there is inflation it means that with the same money we can buy less things than before.
Capacity refers to your ability to pay the loan, taking into account your other debts and expenses. Creditors or lenders assess the ratio between their debts and their income, that is, they make a comparison between what they owe and what they earn. The smaller this relationship, the more creditors will trust in their ability to pay the money they borrow.
Evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court based on the "exclusionary rule."
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of a person's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. If evidence is gathered through an illegal search, it is typically considered "fruit of the poisonous tree" and is excluded from court proceedings, as it is tainted by the initial illegality.
This rule is intended to deter law enforcement from conducting unlawful searches and to protect individuals' constitutional rights. The exclusionary rule is a crucial element of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, upholding the integrity of the legal system.
Know more about exclusionary rule here
#SPJ12
Answer:
BASED ON THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE
Explanation:
The views expressed by Anita in saying that classes will struggle under capitalism is reminiscent of Karl Marx.
Karl Marx believed that after that struggle, a new society would be emerge where class would not be a thing and people would be more equal.
In conclusion, Anita's thoughts mirror Karl Marx's.
Find out more about Karl Marx at brainly.com/question/1092276.
I believe the answer is: Disregard for the law
A behaviour would be considered as 'aggressive' by the law enforcement if it threaten the safety and civility that has been maintained by an established law.
Careless Driving behaviours would definitely endanger the safety of the civilians near them, therefor it would be considered as an aggressive behaviour.
Answer: Disregard of the law.
Explanation:
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), aggressive driving is the running of a vehicle in a way that threatens somebody or someone's property. The driver usually feels justified in bullying others and pushing people out their way follows.
Aggressive driving behavior ca be making an unsafe lane change, or tailgating and ignoring traffic controls.