What did U.S. expansion mean for Latinos personally? Were they able to preserve their status, property and rights? If so, how? If not, what happened to them and how did they respond?

Answer:

The President

Explanation:

One of the roles that the President of the United States fulfills is that of commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces. This is outlined in Article II of the Constitution. This entitles the president to command every action of the military, including supervising military operations, authorizing the deployment of troops and create military policy. However, the president is not able to declare war, as this is a power of Congress.

Answer:

one of the extra surviving legacies of Ashoka was the pattern that he gave for the alliance between Buddhism and the state. Emperor Ashoka was regarded as a role model to heads within the Buddhist society. He not only given direction and force, but he also built personal relations with his followers.

According to the legends  Ashokavadana, Ashoka was not non-violent after choosing Buddhism. In one situation, a non-Buddhist in Pundravardhana painted a picture explaining the Buddha kneeling at the feet of Nirgrantha Jnatiputra  On a reproach from a Buddhist believer, Ashoka announced an order to capture him, and finally, added order to kill all the Ajivikas in Pundravardhana. Nearby 18,000 supporters of the Ajivika following were killed as a consequence of this command.

Ideas to run an empire:

Three important ideas are necessary to follow to run an empire.

An emperor should have leadership qualities to run the empire successfully. He should create some opportunities for the poor community of his state and try to build personal relations with his followers, in regard  he gets huge support of his followers.

To run an empire, economical position of State must be strong, and army should be ready to face any kind of challenging situation imposed by enemies.

Answer:

Ginsburg worked to upend legislation that discriminated based on one's gender and was a founding counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union's Women's Rights Project.

Explanation:

I hope this helps you! Good luck! :)  :)  :)

Answer:

The Tinker case is an important First Amendment case because it defines a student's right to free speech in a public school setting. This ruling would have to be taken into account in any later court cases involving the rights of students in a similar situation.

Explanation:

Final answer:

The majority opinion in the Tinker case effectively applied the principles of the First Amendment, upholding students' rights to symbolic speech even in a school setting. It stressed the importance of First Amendment protections despite potential disruptions.

Explanation:

The Tinker v. Des Moines case was a significant First Amendment case decided by the Supreme Court. The majority opinion held that students do not lose their First Amendment rights when they step onto school property. The Court based this decision on the principle that the First Amendment protects not only the right to speak, but also the right to express oneself symbolically. In Tinker, the students were expressing their opposition to the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands. The majority opinion said that this was protected symbolic speech.

Despite ramifications, like potential disturbances in school, the Court believed First Amendment protections were more significant due to their long-term importance. It emphasized that schools could not ban such symbolic expressions just based on a fear of possible disruption.

Thus, the majority opinion in the Tinker case applied the principles of the First Amendment effectively, considering the need for freedom of speech and expression, even in the context of a school. It affirmed that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate.

Learn more about Tinker case here:

brainly.com/question/34205496

#SPJ3

The correct example of a social cost stemming from this data is:

More deaths mean fewer workers.

Some key social costs and impacts of the massive casualties from the Civil War include:

• Loss of labour force: Nearly 617,000 total deaths represented a huge loss of workers and productivity. This dealt a major blow to the economies of the North and South.

• Increased financial burden: Caring for the wounded and families of the dead came at a huge financial cost, especially for the South with fewer resources. This included medical care, pensions, and support for widows and orphans.

• Psychological trauma: The immense loss of life and suffering caused deep psychological trauma that lasted for generations. This was especially true of the South.

• Disruption of families and communities: So many deaths and life-long injuries meant the war tore apart the fabric of families, friendships, neighbourhoods and towns across the country.

• Impact on population growth: A large number of casualties represented a significant % of the population and slowed the growth of the nation's overall population for decades.

• Fewer national elections: While deaths would not directly impact the number of elections held, the loss of voting-age men could influence the outcome of elections and shape policy. However, this was not the primary social cost.

• More disease: This was not an accurate example of a social cost. While disease contributed to deaths, more disease itself was not have a major social impact.

• More battles: This was also not an accurate example. The number of casualties was the result of the cumulative impact of battles, not the direct cause of more battles.

In summary, the greatest social costs were loss of life, economic hardship, trauma, and disruption - not more disease or battles. The enormous death toll meant fewer workers and greater financial burdens, especially for the South.

don't forget to give me the brilliant mark.

Answer: D More deaths means fewer workers.

Explanation: