Aren't
2. Underground caverns _______ a big tourist attraction in Virginia.
is
are
3. Isaac Asimov’s Book of Facts _______ full of interesting bits of information.
is
are
4. _______ the café have a special lunch every day?
Doesn't
Don't
5. We _______ on the telephone for very long.
wasn't
weren't
1.Aren’t the pyramids in Mexico?
The correct answer is “aren’t” since the subject of the verb is “the pyramids”, which is a plural noun and the subject-verb agreement corresponds with the third person plural.
2. Underground caverns are a big tourist attraction in Virginia.
The correct option is “are” because the subject is “underground caverns”, a plural noun that agrees with the verb to be in the third person plural.
3. Isaac Asimov’s Book of Facts is full of interesting bits of information.
In this sentence, the correct answer is the verb form “is” since the subject refers to the book that is a singular noun, which corresponds with the third person singular. The subject can be replaced by the personal pronoun “it”.
4.Doesn’t the café have a special lunch every day?
The correct answer is “doesn’t” since this is an auxiliary verb in the negative form that agrees with the subject of the question “the café”. The subject could be replaced by “it”, and that is why the auxiliary verb must correspond with the third person singular.
5. We weren’t on the phone for very long.
In this sentence, the correct option is “weren’t” because this is the past form of the verb to be that corresponds with the first person plural “we”.
The correct way to fill in the blanks of each of the sentence chossing either a singular or a plural verb is as follows:
To know whether we should use a verb in its singular or plural form, we must look first at the subject and determined if it is a singular or a plural noun. Let's do that for each subject:
Learn more about singular and plural here:
A.
orifice : clasp
B.
trident : three
C.
indentation : notch
D.
dossier : information
Judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion by the fact that the dissent uses cases with similar conclusions as support and the correct option is option D.
In judicial reviews, both the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion analyze and interpret the law to determine the constitutionality or legality of a particular issue. However, they often arrive at different conclusions.
In the majority opinion, the justices who form the majority provide the legal reasoning and rationale for their decision. They typically rely on legal principles, precedents, constitutional interpretation, and sometimes public policy considerations to support their conclusions. The majority opinion sets the legal precedent for future cases.
On the other hand, in the dissenting opinion, justices who disagree with the majority decision present their own analysis and reasoning. The dissenting justices may use cases with similar conclusions to argue against the majority's interpretation of the law. They may highlight inconsistencies in the majority's reasoning or provide alternative interpretations of the law.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about Judicial reviews, here:
#SPJ5
First-person point of view A) It places the reader into the action as a character in the story.
Second-person point of view B) It engages the reader with a character from a story narrating the action.
Third-person point of view C) It allows you to reveal the inner thoughts of multiple characters.
First-person point of view = A
Second-person point of view = B
Third-person point of view = C