Answer:
Explanation:
Increased government regulation: The Progressive Era was characterized by a growing belief in the need for government intervention to address social and economic issues. The Progressive Party's platform likely reflected this sentiment by advocating for increased government regulation of industries, such as trusts and monopolies, to promote fair competition and protect consumers.
Social reforms: Progressives sought to address social inequalities and improve living conditions. The Progressive Party's platform might have included support for issues such as labor rights, women's suffrage, child labor laws, and improved working conditions.
Political reforms: Progressives aimed to combat corruption and enhance democracy. The Progressive Party may have advocated for political reforms such as direct election of senators, campaign finance reform, and measures to increase government transparency and accountability.
Conservation and environmental protection: The Progressive Era saw increased awareness of environmental issues and the need for conservation. The Progressive Party might have emphasized the importance of preserving natural resources, creating national parks, and implementing policies to protect the environment.
Anti-imperialism: Some Progressives opposed U.S. involvement in overseas expansion and advocated for a more restrained foreign policy. The Progressive Party's platform could have reflected this sentiment by opposing imperialism and advocating for a focus on domestic issues.
Answer: Innovations in agricultural technology increased the production of cotton. As a result, Southern plantations needed greater numbers of enslaved workers.
Explanation
a. True
b. False
The correct answer is A. True
Explanation:
Harriet Tubman was an African American woman known for her actions to support abolition. Tubman was born around 1822 and was a slave in a plantation in Maryland because her parents and other ancestors were also slaves. However, around 1849 and after one failed attempt Harriet Tubman escaped using the Underground Railroad that was a network of routes slaves used to scape to states or territories where slavery was not allowed.
This action took her to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania where she was free. Additionally, after Harriet Turban became a free woman she helped many others to scape; indeed, it is believed around 70 people were free because of her actions. According to this, it is true Harriet Tubman was a runaway slave from Maryland because she was a slave from childhood in a plantation in Maryland but later scaped.
Yes, Harriet Tubman was a runaway slave from Maryland. She escaped and then helped many other slaves to freedom via the Underground Railroad and is a significant figure in American history.
The answer to your question, 'Was Harriet Tubman a runaway slave from the state of Maryland?' is True. Harriet Tubman was indeed a runaway slave from Maryland. Born into slavery, she escaped and then used a network known as the Underground Railroad, to lead hundreds of enslaved people to freedom. Tubman's brave and audacious actions have made her an iconic figure in American history.
#SPJ6
B.) England
C.) Austria
D.) Italy
A, Spain.
hope this helps
Answer:
Italy
Explanation:
would be the ANSWER l am sure but you can look it up in Google
Answer:
to ensure that it could conduct trade with and exert influence in China
Explanation:
Answer:
B.
Dead Sea
Explanation:
Answer:
In 1803, despite his doubts about the constitutionality of the power of Congress to buy land, President Jefferson made the purchase of Louisiana to France, doubling the size of the United States. The land acquired in this way amounted to 23% of the United States today, of about 810,000 ml², comprised the current states of Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, the Minnesota area east of the Mississippi River, North Dakota, Dakota of the South, Nebraska, Oklahoma, most of Kansas, zones of Montana, Wyoming, the territory of Colorado to the east of the Rocky Mountains and the one of Luisiana to the east of the Mississippi river, with the city of New Orleans included.
The region of Louisiana was occupied by France at the beginning of the 18th century. In 1763, the Treaty of Paris, which ended the Seven Years' War, established that the eastern part of the Mississippi was ceded to Great Britain, while ratifying the Treaty of Fontainebleau by which France ceded the rest of Louisiana to Spain in compensation for the loss of Florida. In 1800 this territory returned to French sovereignty by the third Treaty of San Ildefonso. In 1802, however, there were two events that President Thomas Jefferson considered hostile to the interests of the United States: the sending of French troops to New Orleans and the island of Santo Domingo to suppress uprisings that had broken out in those territories, and the abolition of the right of deposit, privilege agreed with the American merchants in the past to store goods in New Orleans until their transshipment. Jefferson sent James Monroe to Paris to collaborate with the plenipotentiary minister in France, Robert R. Livingston, in the attempt to carry out one of the following four possibilities: the purchase of eastern and western Florida and New Orleans; the acquisition only of New Orleans; or the purchase of the territory on the banks of the Mississippi River to build a US port or the acquisition in perpetuity of navigation and storage rights.
The previous negotiations between Livingston and the French Minister of Foreign Affairs, Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Perigord, failed. Later the international situation worsened for France. The French army of Santo Domingo was decimated by an epidemic of yellow fever and an uprising broke out on the island. Napoleon, determined to make the most of such a complicated situation, gave new instructions to Talleyrand, and on April 11, 1803, he surprised Monroe and Livingston with a single, non-negotiable offer: the purchase of Louisiana as a whole. Although this operation exceeded their powers, the US ambassadors accepted. At the beginning of May, three documents were signed by which France ceded Louisiana to the United States. The agreed price was of 15 million dollars, of which 11,250,000 supposed the payment to France of the rights of cession of the territories. The remaining $ 3,750,000 were used by the United States government to satisfy the claims of its citizens against France.
At the time of the purchase, Jefferson was questioned about the constitutionality of the acquisition of territories for not adding a new amendment to the US Constitution that would give him legal coverage. However, the acquisition of Louisiana was ratified by the United States Senate in the form of a treaty.