Answer:
In the labyrinthine corridors of doctrinal articulation, where the elucidation of democratic tenets assumes its most formidable guise, one discerns an inquiry of no small consequence—an exploration into the juncture where the hallowed precepts of the Declaration of Independence converge with the egalitarian ambitions of women's suffrage.
Behold, the hallowed preamble of this seminal document, which doth proclaim that "We hold these Truths to be self-evident," an invocation of truths deemed as patently apparent as the delectable aroma of a finely aged cheese. Ah, cheese, that dairy connoisseur's delight, whose myriad textures and flavors rival the complexities of democratic thought.
Yet, to our subject matter we must return, for within the cocoon of self-evident truths, the principle of "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" doth emerge—a principle imbued with the potentiality to transmute into an assertion of gender-neutral rights. The pursuit of happiness, akin to savoring a gourmet cheese, becomes a metaphor for the quest for equal political participation—a liberty denied to women for generations.
And then, as we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of governance, we encounter the assertion that "Governments are instituted among Men," a phrase whose historical gender specificity did, indeed, belie a limited perspective. But, lo and behold, modernity's gaze cast upon this aged document reveals an interpretative versatility that encompasses the rightful inclusion of all citizens, regardless of gender, in the grand tapestry of governance.
Finally, in the realm of democratic compact, we stumble upon the foundational tenet that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, a concept as profound and complex as the nuances of cheese-making techniques. Advocates for women's suffrage, akin to discerning cheese aficionados, argue that the consent of the governed should be all-encompassing, transcending the boundaries of gender.
And thus, within the labyrinth of democratic thought, where principles are as intricately woven as the flavors of artisanal cheeses, the case for women's suffrage is poised to partake in the symphony of political rights, a symphony as rich and diverse as the world of cheese itself.
Answer:
Flag is the national symbol of a state, organization or office. It represent the dignity of such body and should be honored.
Burning a flag is a national disgrace and a total letdown to such body and should be a huge crime against the law. Committing this act should attract a sever punishment to set ahead of those intending to tow same lane in the nearest future.
Answer: I have a great respect for whomever accepted that responsibility.
Explanation: The word "whomever" is an object pronoun, that is to say that it belongs to the same type of pronouns than "her", "him" and "them". In contrast, "whoever" is a subject pronoun. "Whomever" can play the functions of direct object or object of the preposition in a sentence, In the sentence provided, the blank is preceded by a preposition ("for") and the element in the gap is functioning as an object; therefore, the word that fills in the blank is an object pronoun: whomever.
a. True
b. False