Answer:
Environmental pollution has escalated in the recent past, compromising our planet's future. This critical issue might sabotage the integrity of ecosystems and the health and well-being of all living creatures, including humans. For this reason, humans must acknowledge the gravity of the situation and implement robust measures to combat this looming crisis.
The most concerning aspects of environmental pollution is air pollution. Industries, vehicles, and other combustion processes release harmful pollutants that deteriorate air quality in many urban areas. These contaminants also cause respiratory diseases and a decrease the overall quality of life. Moreover, greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide have continually accelerated climate change, posing a global threat with far-reaching consequences.
Furthermore, water pollution is critical cause of concern for the environment. Rivers, lakes, and oceans are the dumping grounds for toxic chemicals, plastics, and other waste products. Consequently, marine life suffers, while the contamination of water sources jeopardizes the availability of clean drinking water for millions. Humans must establish robust measures to reverse the adverse impacts of water pollution on water quality.
To combat this challenge, we must adopt sustainable practices, reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, and invest in clean energy sources. Additionally, stricter regulations and enforcement could help curb industrial pollution. Individuals can also make a difference by reducing their carbon footprint, minimizing single-use plastics, and supporting conservation efforts. Therefore, environmental pollution requires a multi-faceted approach and collaboration between various stakeholders.
Humans have the opportunity to change the course of environmental pollution. They must act now to protect our planet for future generations and ensure a healthier, more sustainable future. It's time to take action, for the sake of our planet and all its inhabitants.
I can guide you to improve your writing skills and help you score maximum points in your essays and assignments. Reach out through proffrank01[at]gm ail. co m.
Explanation:
Answer:
Mollie
Explanation:The pigs plan the animal rebellion against Mr. Jones very, very carefully with everything planned out.
World War II posters were helpful in mobilizing the whole country. These posters which were created were designed in such a way that it addressed each and every citizen of the country as a combatant in the war.
Further explanation regarding the WWII posters is mentioned below:
• The purpose of these posters were to make every citizen a part of the struggles going on.
• Some gave the message that people’s home and their factories were also like battlefields.
• The posters were to put forward the propaganda that the people should accept the ways of the existing government.
Therefore, such posters were created with the motive of persuading the people of the nation to be more careful.
Learn more about World War II posters here:
Our mission continues. Al-Qaida is wounded, not destroyed. The scattered cells of the terrorist network still operate in many nations, and we know from daily intelligence that they continue to plot against free people. The proliferation of deadly weapons remains a serious danger. The enemies of freedom are not idle, and neither are we. Our government has taken unprecedented measures to defend the homeland — and we will continue to hunt down the enemy before he can strike.
Which answer is a complete and correct summary of this part of the speech?
Breaking up a terrorist organization doesn’t necessarily destroy them completely.
There is better intelligence now about terrorism, thanks to modern surveillance techniques.
Many terrorists have worked extremely hard to get deadly weapons to use in warfare.
There is much work to be done because the terrorists will not rest – but neither will we.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Mission Accomplished speech was a broadcast address by United States President George W. Bush on the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1, 2003.
Albeit Bush expressed at the time "Our mission continues" and "We have difficult work to do in Iraq," he likewise expressed that it was the conclusion to real battle activities in Iraq. Shrub never articulated the expression "Mission Accomplished"; a flag expressing "Mission Accomplished" was utilized as a background to the discourse.
The correct answer is B) the abstract idea of the “Silent Land”.
The aspect of the excerpt of Christina Rossetti’s poem “Remember” that the imagists have disliked is the abstract idea of the “Silent Land”.
The poem “Remeber” written by Christina Rossetti refers to a self-portrait of the main character contemplating his death. An Imaginist had disliked the abstract idea of a “Silent Land” because imaginists were American writers and poets in the 20th century that supported precision the description of moments and concepts, based on clear and correct language.
The other options of the question were, a) the ordinary language as in remember and gone. c) the first-person singular perspective, and d) the sentiment in remembering of someone who has left.
Answer:
The correct answer is option b) The abstract idea of the "silent land".
Explanation:
Imagism is a poetry movement that consists in showing an image without veils, and instead indicating exactly what they are referring to, normally trying to make a direct impression of the essence of something. Usually, the perspective is from a first-person singular, but not as a rule, that is why the option c) is not correct.
They contrast with the Romantic Movement trying to resemble the real things, and not to go beyond natural experiences. So, even if the main topic of the poem "Remember" of Christina Rossetti is a sentiment of somebody who has left, as mentioned in option d), it is not expressed with exaggerations and it is not corny. Instead, it is a remark of a prominent reality: that someone is going to die and someone will stay alive, and with that the one that is leaving manifest that the memories of him or her should make the other happy when she or he is gone, but not in a corny way. That makes the option d) not the correct answer.
Finally, as the imagist tried to be as real as they could with the experience, then they would not matter using ordinary language, this is why the option a) is not in contradiction with this movement, for imagist poets would in fact use the precise language even if it is ordinary to refer the experience they are talking about, but they would not like to use symbolized references.
Christina Rossetti uses in most of the poem ordinary language that goes direct to what she is talking about, but in one part she uses a symbol and not the direct word: when she alludes to the after-life, by the words of "Silent Land", as mentioned in option b). This is the main part that imagists would have disliked as they tried to emphasize reality and not fiction or figures, and that makes it the correct answer.
The words that describe an example of slant rhyme are the damp and swamp.
Rhyme is the word that creates a similar sound and is used at the end of the lines of the poetry.
A type of rhyme where the two wordsdo not have any similar sound but are still similar. From the given pair of words, the words damp and swamp are representing similar words but both of them have different sounds like the word damp is having 'amp' sound and the word swamp is having a 'wamp' sound.
Therefore, the words damp and swamp represent the type of slant rhyme.
Learn more about the slant rhyme in the related link:
#SPJ2
(5 pt) supplicate
A.
to give
B.
to answer
C.
to beseech
D.
to ignore