How is a civic action such as voting different from serving on a jury?
Answer:
Jury service is considered a civic duty while voting is a responsibility.
Explanation:
Answer:
some people protest against Christopher Columbus being seen as a hero because. Columbus’s main goal was finding and taking resources for Spain. These resources included the people Columbus brought back to Spain as slaves. His sailors stole from, kidnapped, and murdered native people. Additionally, the Europeans brought diseases with them. These diseases killed many people. They had no defense against the illnesses. Columbus may have opened the Americas to colonization. He also destroyed many of the indigenous cultures in the process.
Explanation:
It depends on how one looks at Columbus, in some terms he was a hero for finding Spain more land & cultivating it in a way. He was also a Villian for the way he treated American natives.
Lowell,Massachusetts, is important in 19th century American history because it was one of the first "factory towns" in the United States. Thus option (C) is correct.
What is a factory?
A factory can be any structure or premises where the making of any products or part of any article. The alteration, repair, ornamentation, finishing, cleaning or washing of any article takes place.
The examples of factories include: where manufacturing takes place or plants, car-servicing workshops, shipyards and construction work-sites.
A factory cab be a building or group of buildings where commodities are manufactured or assembled mainly by machines with the help of humans. The capitalists owns the factories in which the labor force works.
Lowell, Massachusetts, is important in 19th century American history because it was one of the first "factory towns" in the United States. Therefore, option (C) is correct.
Learn more about factory here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The city became known as the cradle of the American Industrial Revolution, due to a large series of textile mills and factories.
B. Mesopotamia
C. Both
D.neither
Jerusalem
B.
Athens
C.
Byzantium
D.
Carthage
The United States v. Fields case ended up on a federal death sentence imposed on Fields for commitig a federal capital offense.
This sentence was made largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could predict Fields would be a risk to society in the future.
The problem here is that the psychiatrist issued this crucial testimony without doing any testing or offering any objective empirical data whatsoever.
To this day, there's still much debate involving how a Court can determine risk to society or future violence from an individual, in a safe and reliable manner that reaches necessary standards for a case of such magnitude assessing death penalty.
Hope this helps!