B. the noun or pronoun to which a pronoun refers.
C. an adjective that appears after the noun it modifies.
D. the noun that completes a prepositional phrase.
Answer:
the correct answer is B
Explanation:
Answer:
Roman numerals in an outline signify subdivisions
Explanation:
The geometric boundary between the United States and Canada
B
The border of the European Union
с
The Pyrenees Mountains between France and Spain
D
The geometric boundary between Iraq and Saudi Arabia
E
The Great Wall of China
An example of a superimposed boundary is:
Option D
A superimposed boundry can be characterized as the limit forced on a geological locale or region by a colonizing, vanquishing or an outside power and therefore, the prior social associations and examples are totally disregarded.
A few instances of a superimposed limit is the mathematical limit among Iraq and Saudi Arabia,Uganda and Kenya, just as different limits forced on Africa by the Europeans during the period of imperialism.
A superimposed limit is a limit that has been forced on a space by an outside or vanquishing power. This limit disregards the social associations on this scene.
An allocational limit debate is an argument about the right to assets. An allocational question emerges from both regular assets, like water from a typical source, and business assets, like oil from underneath lining land.
For more information, refer the following link:
Answer:
D. The geometric boundary between Iraq and Saudi Arabia.
Explanation:
A superimposed boundary can be defined as the boundary imposed on a geographical region or area by a colonizing, conquering or an external power and as a result of this, the preexisting cultural organizations and patterns are completely ignored.
Some examples of a superimposed boundary is the geometric boundary between Iraq and Saudi Arabia, Uganda and Kenya, as well as other boundaries imposed on Africa by the Europeans during the era of colonialism.
B. The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence.
C. The majority opinion uses summaries provided by the case attorneys.
D. The majority opinion uses the dissent as the basis of the argument.
The correct answer is B. The majority opinion uses lower courts' decision on the case of evidence.
Judicial review is termed as a process which legislative or executive actions are being subjected to review by the judiciary.
Only the judicial review can invalidate government actions and laws which are being incompatible to higher authority.
Law can be invalidated either by violating the constitutional terms or by being unlawful.
Judicial reviews in the majority opinion differ from those in the dissent by B. The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence.
Judicial review is a process which executive or legislative actions are subjected to review by the judiciary. The other meaning of it is when justices look at the previous courts decisions on the case
Whereas dissent itself is an opinion in a legal case when judges disagree and there are others such as the majority that agrees. When one or more judges express disagreement with the majority opinion of the members of the court, it is said that they are dissenting.
Judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion by the dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support. The dissent uses the majority opinion as evidence in a judicial review. While dissenting opinions can be cited in other cases when a change in the law is needed. The dissent uses the majority opinion as evidence of its case.
Grade: 9
Subject: English
Chapter: Judicial reviews
Keywords: Judicial reviews, the dissent, The majority opinion, courts' decisions, the case attorneys
did you figure out the answer