​Members of the --- are elected on the basis of the state's population at the most recent U.S.census, but each state has an equal number of --- House Senate Senators Representatives

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The answer is House of Representatives and Senators. Starting from 1926, the group of the government paralleled that of the US Congress. Assembly members like their equivalents in the U.S House of Representatives were chosen by country in the similar way that each state has two U.S Senators.
Answer 2
Answer:

Members of the House of Representatives are elected on the basis of the state's population at the most recent U.S.census, but each state has an equal number of Senators.

Further Explanations:

The Virginia Plan hosted by Virginian delegate James Madison in “constitutional Convention of 1787” aiming at populace subjected representation. The convention was assembled in “Philadelphia” for the amendment of “Article of Confederation”. Though the plan was not appropriate, so only a few clauses of the plan were adopted including legislative branch containing bicameral Legislature centered on the standard of rotation and recall appeal.

As per the constitution adopted composition of House of Representatives elected was set as per the State’s population statistics. In the case of the Senate, each state were representing an equal number of senators.  As per the current record House of Representatives comprises 435 representatives elected by the nations voters for the term of four years while composition of Senators is 100 serving for tenure of six years. Presently Senators are elected through the election of senators as per the referendum since 1913 by the ratification of 7th Amendment act. Before 1913 senators were nominated by the State legislature.

Learn more

  1. while lead architect of the new st. peter's project, what was Michelangelo's design contribution to the project?brainly.com/question/3595653
  2. under the articles of confederation, if Virginia had ten thousand citizens and Delaware had five thousand citizens, how many votes would each state have in the legislature? brainly.com/question/9935193
  3. though the outcomes of Schenck and new york times differed, what did these decisions have in common? the government has a heavy burden to prove harm. the government can limit speech that causes harm. the government has unlimited power to limit speech. the government must follow the first amendment? brainly.com/question/1804110

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter:  Legislature

Keywords:

Virginia Plan, Virginian delegate, James Madison, Constitutional Convention of 1787, Philadelphia, Article of Confederation, legislative branch, House of Representatives, Senate, Senators, 7th Amendment act, State legislature.


Related Questions

Why did Ronald Reagan call the USSR the "Evil Empire"?
How can the foreign policy role of the United States be classified in the years afterthe American Revolution?A:IsolationistB:NeutralC:ImperialistD:Expansionist
I have 4 extended response history questions I need answered asap please and thank you. :)1. What powers did the Rowlatt Bills give to the British government? 2. Why were the Indians so upset about the passage of this bill. 3. What is the difference between satyagraha and hartal? 4. How do you think Nehru felt about Gandhi? Give reasons for your answer. If anyone knows the answers to these questions and could give them to me it would be greatly appreciated because history isn't one of my strong subjects. Again, thank you so much!! :)
How many people are estimated to be converted worldwide at this time?
Alexander the Great died of ________ in 326 b. c.

What political group did hitler begin to punish once he came to power?a. monarchists
b. republicans
c. communists
d. fascists

Answers

It was primarily the political group of the "communists" whom Hitler began to punish once he came to power, since he viewed them as trying to overthrow his government. 

"That which might be the first clear representation of a horse in the Middle East can be found in a tablet form Ur III, reign of Šu-Sin, 2037 – 2029 BCE . . . Therefore, it is possible to place domestic horses in Ur prior to 2000 BCE. Since horse domestication took place in the steppes of northern Kazakhstan, a link between this region and the Middle East must be found, in order to account for the horses' presence there. Only after c. 2100 BCE did horses begin to appear regularly in the Near and Middle east. This means that sometime between c.2500 and c.2100 BCE, there was an increase in the influx of horses into the region."From The Origin and the Spread of the War Chariot by Elias Manuel Morgado Pinheiro (2010).
The author's argument could best be understood in the context of which of the following historical developments?
Choose 1 answer:
Choose 1 answer:

(Choice A)
A
There was an exchange of technology and methods of transportation between the steppes and Mesopotamia.

(Choice B)
B
There was an exchange of technology and methods of transportation between the Mongol Empire and the steppes.

(Choice C)
C
Mesopotamian military expeditions spread their civilization and city-states into the Eurasian steppes

(Choice D)
D
The independent development of new technologies within Mesopotamian society spread to the steppes

Answers

The author's argument is most consistent with the historical development of (A) There was an exchange of technology and methods of transportation between the steppes and Mesopotamia.

The exchange of technology and strategies of transportation between the steppes and Mesopotamia was a critical historical advancement that had a significant effect on both societies. The introduction of horses to Mesopotamia gave the individuals of that locale a modern and effective weapon, which they utilized to extend their exchange systems and military control.

The individuals of the steppes too embraced unused advances from Mesopotamia, such as water systems and metalworking, which helped them to move forward with their claimed way of life.

This exchange of technology made a difference in forming a more interconnected world, and it is one of the numerous variables that contributed to the advancement of civilization. The trade of innovation between the steppes and Mesopotamia may be an update that human societies have continuously been interconnected.

Hence, the correct option is A.

Learn more about Technology, here:

brainly.com/question/9171028

#SPJ3

I believe it is A. Not so sure though

Why were the Federalist, Democratic-Republican, Democratic, and Republican parties created?

Answers

First, this gets to the matter of "why federalize?" We federalized to meet an external threat. There was England, to be sure, but the colonists were also well-traveled and could make their own predictions about Europe, and we see that, no matter what they might have predicted, France did indeed become a grave threat. So one reason (and this implies there are others) is to meet an external threat. What other reasons might there be? I don't know. But I would immediately jump to the thought of an internal threat. So you might think about that. The southern colonies never liked the constitution, and they became a threat soon afterward. One source to look at is Novus Ordo Seclorum: Intellectual Origins of the Constitution, by McDonald. But let me get back on point here. Federalism is not the only way to meet the needs of a nation. There are other options, such as unitary state. But we had a system of entrenched states, and we had inherited a common-law tradition in which the sovereignty of local governments was hallowed by tradition. And we had just fought a war of separation that revealed the weaknesses of a confederacy; it's not unified, and a confederacy doesn't cede any power to the center, so there is no strong national defense with a unified command, which is vital to warmaking. When a group of local governments, or baronies or cantons or states or whatever, confederates, they are limiting power to the center, but all that does is shift power over people to local control. The nation's first government, the First Continental Congress, was not able to hold the nation together under the strain of these wars between France and England. Witness George Washington's difficulties holding the army together as he was outmaneuvered and chased all around Baltimore and New York by the British commander, Howe (who was under Cornwallis). 

So there were 2 sides to the debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Feds. The Feds were actually anti-democratic. They wanted to limit the impacts of faction. This is a huge debate. The Feds are represented by "Publius," the collective name for John Jay, Madison, and Hamilton. They won the Constitutional debate. 

Jefferson was not a framer of the Constitution; he was in France when it was signed, and he was an Anti-Fed, and this is the party that lost the debates. His contribution to American political thought is the thought of a living document. He wrote the Declaration, which is based on Enlightenment liberalism ("classical liberalism") and he felt that people were best governed by a "natural aristocracy" of enlightened freehold farmers. This does not preclude owning slaves, by the way. The liberal argument (which is really the only argument) for justifying slavery is that you can"t interfere with the natural right of a man to own a slave. (!) This is the argument later on during the Civil War, in Calhoun's "Southern Defense." 

The Federalists were the "Radical Republicans." The Anti-Feds were the "Jeffersonian Democrats" or "Democratic Republicans."

Later, Jacksonian democracy took hold. This was the thought that drove Manifest Destiny and encouraged the pioneering spirit. The Jacksonian Democrats relied heavily on government assistance since they were pushing westward. So there is this ideally-democratic thought of self-sufficiency: instead of being "self-sufficient" in the Jeffersonian sense, the pioneers prized hard work and the ability to fix whatever needed fixing. It gave meat to the phrase "American ingenuity." It also fueled women's rights and suffrage later, because pioneer women were expected to work just as hard as the men. They showed that they were not just Eastern Belles who relied on men for their station in a leisure class. 

But at the same time, the Jacksonian Democrats, for all the talk of self-sufficiency, relied on the government for assistance. They were pushing westward before, during, and after the Civil War, which is when the Indian Wars were taking off, with their presence pressuring the Indians. So pioneers settled around forts for protection, and they required assistance in linking up transportation networks on land and in the riverine systems. 

Conservative democrats favored the South, which was trying to keep the East and West from linking up. The linkage would mean the death of the Southern Master class, which was dependent on slavery for its economy. Calhoun pushed to have the country form up into 4 "economic zones," each region having veto power over the other. This was just an attempt to stall the inevitable economic linkage of the East and West as the nation grew. In 1857, Dred Scott split the Democratic Party along abolitionist lines. Chief Justice Taney was a Democrat, and the dissents came from the 2 Republican justices. So it rent the Democratic Party in two, with Dixiecrats on one side and the "progressives" on the other. Eventually, the conservatives in the Democratic Party defected to the GOP. 


What was a major result of the glorious revolution

Answers

It limited the effect the monarch had in England. It made the monarch a figurehead. This is significant because the monarchy never regained its power, even to today. 
A major result of the glorious revolution was that England further limited its monarchy.

Which explains how mass media has changed the role of the presidency

Answers

Back when media was not easily accessible to masses, Presidents could operate in a vacuum. Their decisions and actions were made public by the administration in a controlled manner. Presidents could paint any picture they wanted. That all changed wth the advent of Radio and TV. With mass media, journalists got power to independently scrutinize President's policy and actions. Mass media informed public and empowered them. President's could no longer work in a vacuum. This has further evolved with popularization of social media. Now scrutiny power has been distributed among citizen journalists. Now everyone can question and debate Presidents actions. Putting more pressure on the President to act in the best interest of public. This phenomena has strengthened democracy more.

What is 100 years of jrotc yesterday today tomorrow

Answers

My SAI suggested that we write about things from the past, whats going on in the present and what might happen in the future to improve our program.  
100 Years of JROTC yesterday today tomorrow is an essay form assignment given to JROTC cadets  by their instructers to show what they know about JROTCs history and what research they have done.