Which event was not related to the anti-Vietnam war movement?a. march on Washington
b. assassination of martin Luther king jr
c. democratic national convention violence
d. Kent state university killings

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: It would be the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. is the event that is not related to the movement of an anti-Vietnam War. This movement that happened around year 1964 and it was the United States who was involved in this war that occurred in Vietnam. King's assassination was a different event. It happened in the year 1968 and he was shot. Answer for this is B.
Answer 2
Answer: I believe The answer is B

Related Questions

Who might write a letter to their representatives about a policy issue?
Why did the California gold rush come to an end
In the two-tiered system of colonial government in the early eighteenth century, which group had authority to enact laws that applied both to colonists and to people in great britain?
General George McClellan was Lincoln's Democratic opponent in the 1864 election.a. Trueb. False
South Africa became a democracy when a new constitution was written in what year?

How did congressional Republicans and Democrats respond to President Bush’s proposed changes to immigration law?

Answers

The congressional Republicans and Democrats were very vocal in their criticism of the proposed changes to the immigration laws wanted by President Bush. The bill was introduced in the senate of the United States on 9th of May in the year 2007, but it never saw the light of the day. The bill came up for debate several times, but it was never passed.

Answer:

Both parties criticized his guest worker program.

Explanation:

What group held up democratic progress in both brazil and Argentina until the 1980s

Answers

Hey there! 

Mainly the military was involved in holding up the democratic progress in both Brazil and Argentina until the 1980s. However, landowners and industrialist played a role as well. 

Thank you!

How did the ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson affect the legalities of segregation?A. It set legal precedent for future court cases.
B. It implemented desegregation legislation.
C. It redefined the concepts of “separate but equal.”
D. It discouraged people from continued protests.

Answers

C. The ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson affect the legalities of segregation by redefining the “separate but equal” doctrine as a legal precedent.

Further Explanation:

The Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson took place in the aftermath of an incident that took place in year 1892, when Homer Plessy, an African American passenger, was arrested as he refused to move from the paid first-class car because he was man of color. He was charged for violating the Separate Car Act of 1890. His attorneys entered a plea based on the equal protection of the laws that was guaranteed to them by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court had passed a ruling that rejected this argument of violation of constitutional rights.

The Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896 upheld the issue of racial segregation. It was sanctioned as per the “separate but equal” doctrine,and on the constitutional grounds ruled that any state law was not in conflict with the 13th and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution.

The ruling had some major implications at the society level mainly concerning the education of colored people which was deemed necessary for their emancipation. The most important was regarding the funding of educational institutions or segregated schools. The segregated schools had to bear the brunt of racial discrimination in terms of under funding and inferior educational supplies and buildings.

Learn more:

1. A provision of the us neutrality act of 1935  brainly.com/question/2412497

2. The part of the us government that interprets laws is the... brainly.com/question/889076

Answer Details:

Grade: College History

Subject: History

Chapter: The Supreme Court and Civil Rights

Keywords: Plessy v. Ferguson, separate but equal, legal precedent, Supreme Court, 1892, Homer Plessy, African American, Separate Car Act of 1890, Fourteenth Amendment, U.S. Constitution, Constitutional rights, 1896, Racial segregation, 13th and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution, Education, Funding, Segregated schools .

The ruling in Plessy C. Ferguson affects the legalities of segregation because:

(C) It redefined the concepts of separate but equal.

Further explanation

This case occurred in the state of Virginia, a former Confederate state in the southern United States. The local law was segregationist. For example, the railway company had to create wagons for blacks and whites separately. Homer Plessy, an Afro-American man who was not allowed to sit in the white wagon, decided to break the law. He was arrested and sent to the Supreme Court of the United States.

This court confirmed the judgment of the court of Louisiana and rejected his claim. The judges said that segregation was not a violation of the 13th amendment that abolished slavery. This judgment more recognized the right of states to apply racist and segregationist laws, as long as each racial group was treated equally with each similar group. There was not a law for all, but a law for each population group. All whites must be equal for the same laws, and all blacks must be equal before the same laws. It was called the concept of separate but equal.

Learn more

  1. The Emancipation proclamation: brainly.com/question/4638275
  2. The Black Codes: brainly.com/question/507264
  3. Martin Luther King’s letter from Birmingham jail: brainly.com/question/2510454

Answer details

Subject: History

Chapter: The Reconstruction Era

Keywords: slavery, segregation, the black people in the United States, southern states, civil rights, separate but equal concept

What is electorial college

Answers

The group of presidential electors required by the Constitution

I believe I interpret the will of the Congress and of the people when I assert that we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermostWhat is the main purpose of mentioning the will of the Congress and of the people here?

A. To assert the right to make a decision without input from others.

B. To deflect responsibility for the decision to go to war.

C. To maintain a diplomatic tone with the allies.

D. To put forth a united opposition to the attacks.

Answers

The correct answer is D) to put forth a united opposition to the attacks.

The main purpose of mentioning the will of the Congress and of the people here was to put forth a united opposition to the attacks.

After the terrible attack of the Japanese army over Pearl Harbor island, in Hawaii, President Roosevelt delivered the "Infamy Speech" in Congress on December 8, 1941.

During the Speech, Roosevelt referred to the will of Congress like this "I believe I will interpret the will of Congress and of the people when I assert that we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost but will make very certain that this form of treachery shall never ender us again.

So we can conclude that the main purpose of mentioning the will of the Congress and of the people here was to put forth a united opposition to the attacks.

The correct answer is D

which most prescisely describes the location of Southwest Asia? a) west of india b) south of the Arctic Circle c) north of the equator d) est of the Mediterranean Sea.

Answers

The statement D) east of the Mediterranean Sea most precisely describes the location of Southwest Asia. This region today is made up of countries such as Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Palestine, Israel, and Saudi Arabia.