Answer:
The correct options are:
Explanation:
According to the economic theory in vogue, we live in a society of freedom of investment, where the imagination and commitment of individuals in the founding of companies can be realized; here, it is said, personal initiative is not restricted, as it does in centrally planned economies, in which the state controls and limits capital. Thus, the strategists of the current model, based on the neoliberal doctrine, assume that ordinary men take the economy in their hands, freely, according to their abilities and inventiveness. Adam Smith in his Wealth of Nations advocates individual investment against monopolies such as the East India Company, which controlled England's trade with its Asian colonies. In revolutionary France, the ascending bourgeoisie that freed itself from feudal oppression, consecrated in the famous law Le Chapelier, 1791, free citizenship as an inalienable right of citizens. With time, this principle incarnated in many cases in the youthful stage of capitalism; in it it was possible. For example, in the United States with the small businessmen who arrived at the 13 colonies, or entrepreneurs who prospered as ranchers in the lands they obtained almost as gifts in the center and west, or exploiting gold veins in California. But that time is over! This idyllic world of opportunities for all, an illusion of many, democratic and inclusive and that attracts the imagination, is increasingly chimerical.
Corporations in U.S. history had advantages over small businesses in access to capital, risk diversification, economies of scale, and limited liability.
In the context of U.S. history, corporations held several advantages over small businesses. Firstly, they had greater access to capital, enabling them to invest in advanced technology, larger staff, and broader marketing efforts. Another advantage was their ability to diversify risk. By operating in different geographic areas and business sectors, corporations mitigated the risk of financial losses. They also had larger economies of scale, which meant they could buy and produce goods more cheaply and efficiently as a result of their size. In the event of financial difficulty, corporations had a critical advantage of 'limited liability,' where investors were only liable for their investment amount, protecting personal assets from corporate financial failure.
#SPJ6
Answer:
unless its a better version (type of person) that others accept (unlike people from Saudi Arabia because of how they look) they will not be wanted or thought of as good to certain people (the large population)
Explanation:
B. The Soviet union sphere of influence in Eastern Europe would expand
C. The Soviet unions sphere of influence in Western Europe would expand
D. The importance of socialism in Europe would increase
c because he is right it should be
Chief Justice Earl Warren convinced the eight other justices to hand down a unanimous decision.
B.
The court ruled that the 14th Amendment did not apply to "separate but equal" public schools.
C.
The earlier Plessy v. Ferguson decision was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education.
D.
Thurgood Marshall argued the NAACP's case before the Supreme Court.
Answer:
B
The court ruled that the 14th Amendment did not apply to "separate but equal" public schools.