B. Warren believed the Court had to honor all precedents.
C. Warren believed that the Supreme Court should uphold the policies of President Eisenhower
D. Warren believed that laws were not flexible, that they had to be interpreted according to the intent of the Framers of the Constitution.
The tyranny of the majority refers to a weakness in the majority rule where the majority of an electorate pursues its objectives. The equal protection clause of the constitution protects us from it.
A constitution refers to a legal, political and social instrument. It helps in the procedures for legislation, administration, and execution.
The tyranny of the majority refers to a state where people or groups of people are treated unfairly.
The equal protection clause refers to a clause that requires equal protection and forces a state to govern impartially.
Learn more about the constitution here:
#SPJ2
The main topic of debate between the two parties was that of Hamilton's financial program. The Federalists wanted to use the federal government to stabilize the national economy. The Democratic-Republicans, however, disliked the expanded role of the new national government. They worried that the federal government would assume powers it did not rightfully possess.
This points towards the second difference between the two parties: their thoughts on the role of the government. Democratic-Republicans championed limited government. They were worried that an elite class, far away in the capital, would make decisions for the citizens. They saw it as a betrayal of the American Revolution. The Federalists were mostly wealthy merchants and planters, and were considered a commercial class that was not in favour of the common people.
Finally, both parties agreed on the question of citizenship. Only free, white males who owned property and paid taxes could vote as citizens of the country.