The correct example of a social cost stemming from this data is:
More deaths mean fewer workers.
Some key social costs and impacts of the massive casualties from the Civil War include:
• Loss of labour force: Nearly 617,000 total deaths represented a huge loss of workers and productivity. This dealt a major blow to the economies of the North and South.
• Increased financial burden: Caring for the wounded and families of the dead came at a huge financial cost, especially for the South with fewer resources. This included medical care, pensions, and support for widows and orphans.
• Psychological trauma: The immense loss of life and suffering caused deep psychological trauma that lasted for generations. This was especially true of the South.
• Disruption of families and communities: So many deaths and life-long injuries meant the war tore apart the fabric of families, friendships, neighbourhoods and towns across the country.
• Impact on population growth: A large number of casualties represented a significant % of the population and slowed the growth of the nation's overall population for decades.
• Fewer national elections: While deaths would not directly impact the number of elections held, the loss of voting-age men could influence the outcome of elections and shape policy. However, this was not the primary social cost.
• More disease: This was not an accurate example of a social cost. While disease contributed to deaths, more disease itself was not have a major social impact.
• More battles: This was also not an accurate example. The number of casualties was the result of the cumulative impact of battles, not the direct cause of more battles.
In summary, the greatest social costs were loss of life, economic hardship, trauma, and disruption - not more disease or battles. The enormous death toll meant fewer workers and greater financial burdens, especially for the South.
don't forget to give me the brilliant mark.
Answer: D More deaths means fewer workers.
Explanation:
Answer:
Michael Jackson was born on August 29, 1958 in Indiana, US and died on June 25, 2009 in LA at 2:26 PM (PDT)
Explanation:
separate themselves from those who were unlike them.
be open to other people’s traditions, ideas, and beliefs.
convince other people to share their common bonds.
Answer: ↓↓↓
Explanation: National identity is a person's identity or a person's sense of belonging to one state or to one nation. It is the sense of a nation as a cohesive whole, as represented by distinctive traditions, culture, and language.
Nationalism encourages individuals with a shared identity to separate themselves from others who do not possess those shared characteristics. This shared identity may be based on factors such as language, culture, or ethnicity. However, the manifestations of nationalism can differ significantly.
Nationalism encouraged people with a shared identity to unite and separate themselves from those who were unlike them. This was often based on shared features like language, culture, or ethnicity. For instance, during the 19th century, the movement for Italian unification, also known as the Risorgimento, was fueled by a shared sense of Italian nationalism in which Italian-speaking people sought nationhood separate from the Austrian Empire. However, it's important to note that the expression of nationalism can vary drastically - while it can lead to separation and conflict, it also can lead to independence movements, support for democratic institutions, and public support for the welfare state.
#SPJ5
Answer: A successful Dutch settlement in the colony grew up on the southern tip of Manhattan Island and was christened New Amsterdam. However, as they were ignorant of European customs of property and contracts, it was not long before the Manhattans came into armed conflict with the expanding Dutch settlement at New Amsterdam.
Explanation:
New Amsterdam, now New York, differed from surrounding colonies due to its diverse culture from European immigrants and enslaved Africans, its focus on trade rather than agriculture, and its religious tolerance. Its development was hindered by the arbitrary governance of the Dutch West India Company and the change of power in 1664 when the English took over.
Life in New Amsterdam in the 17th century differed from surrounding colonies due to its unique cultural diversity, economic structure, and political practices. New Amsterdam was a Dutch settlement primarily known for its fur trade and served as a major seaport. Moreover, it was characterized by religious tolerance and cultural diversity due to the influx of immigrants from various parts of Europe including Belgium, France, Germany and Scandinavia, in addition to the enslaved Africans. Unlike many other colonies at the time, New Amsterdam was not primarily agricultural, but its economy was largely shaped by trade and business.
Street names such as Wall Street still remind us today of the economic focus of this colony. To fortify the colony against Native American uprisings, enslaved Africans were forced to build fortifications, which is a less known fact about the origins of the city. The diversity of the colony is supposed by reports of up to 18 different languages being spoken on the streets of New Amsterdam. However, despite the economic opportunities and religious toleration, the colony grew slowly mainly due to arbitrary government set up by the Dutch West India Company. Religious dissenters who did not belong to the Dutch Reformed Church were persecuted which caused dissatisfaction among the settlers. Termination of Dutch rule in 1664 by the English further caused changes in the colony's governance and development.
#SPJ2
2-New England
3-The Midwest
4-Hawaii
HELP