Answer:
2(x + 4)(x − 4)
Step-by-step explanation:
2x^2 − 32
Factor out 2.
2( x^2 -16)
The term inside the parentheses is the difference of squares.
(a^2 - b^2) = (a-b)(a+b)
2 ( x-4)(x+4)
SHOW ALL STEPS
Answer:
First Example: 3 1/2 + 4 3/4, Second Example: 6 3/8 + 7 9/15
Extra Example: 8 4/20 + 3 5/10
Step-by-step explanation:
First Example:
1/2 + 3/4
1/2 is equal to 2/4 so it is now compatible to be added to 3/4.
2/4 + 3/4
= 5/4
Now for the mixed numbers since its 3 and 4, 3 + 4 = 7.
Final answer is 7 5/4.
Second Example:
3/8 + 9/15
9/15 can be reduced to 3/5
Now the equation is 3/8 + 3/5
= 15/40 + 24/40 is an equivalent equation
15/40 + 24/40
= 39/40
Now for the mixed numbers since its 6 and 7, 6 + 7 = 13
Final answer is 13 39/40.
I am going to include one last example just in case you need one:
Third Example:
4/20 + 5/10
We can reduce these to
1/5 + 1/2
= 2/10 + 5/10 is the equivalent equation
2/10 + 5/10
= 7/10
Now for the mixed numbers since its 8 and 3, 8 + 3 = 11.
Final answer is 11 7/10.
I Hope this helps!
Answer:
P2 affirms P1 and the conclusion is in the same direction.
P1--->P2--->C
This argument is valid.
Step-by-step explanation: using the syllogism rules.
Premises 1 (P1) = Some foreign emissaries are persons without diplomatic immunity,
Premises 2 (P2) = so some persons invulnerable to arrest and prosecution are foreign emissaries
Conclusion (C) = because no persons with diplomatic immunity are persons vulnerable to arrest and prosecution.
From the argument:
P1 uses "some", that means it's not "all" foreign emissaries person that does not have diplomatic immunity. This means that some other foreign emissaries have diplomatic immunity
P2 uses "some", that means it's affirms to that part of P1 which states that some foreign emissaries have diplomatic immunity.
The conclusion is valid because the part of P2 which states that some foreign emissaries are vulnerable to arrest, which affirms with P1 which states that Some foreign emissaries are persons without diplomatic immunity. That means no persons with diplomatic immunity are persons vulnerable to arrest and prosecution. This conclusion literally means that if you don't have diplomatic immunity, you are vulnerable to arrest and prosecution.
Therefore;
P2 affirms P1 and the conclusion is in the same direction.
P1--->P2--->C
This argument is valid.
A. Solve formula for h
B. Find the height of a right circular cylinder whose volume is 72π cubic inches and whose radius is 6 inches.
she would pay $2,450 down and $175 each month. At another dealer, she would pay $3,050 down and
$150 each month. After how many months would the total amount paid be the same for both dealers?
What would that amount be?
After months Kenya will have paid $ for the bike at elther dealer. PLS HELP ASAP
$150 table; 40% discount
Answer:
$60
Step-by-step explanation:
40% of 150=60
40 × 150= $60
100 1