The correct option is D. x = 2, y = -5. The values of x and y of the solution to the system of equations are 2, -5.
When solving a set of equations in mathematics, a matrix is a collection of integers or expressions.
The matrix A is
[A]=[4 -6 8 -2]
The matrix Ax is
[Ax]=[38 -6 26 -2]
The matrix Ay is
[Ay]=[4 38 8 26]
All of the matrices' determinant is
|A| = 40
|Ax| = 80
|Ay| = -200
The value of x is (|Ax|) /(|A|) = 80/(40) = 2
The value of y is ( |Ay|)/(|A|) = -200/(40) = -5
Therefore, the value of x and y is 2, -5. The correct option is D
Learn more about system of equations here
#SPJ1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given Andrew has $600 for materials and can make 18 pieces of furniture, you want to know the number of each kind that maximizes profit if each bookcase costs $20 and gives $60 profit, while each TV stand costs $40 and gives $100 profit.
If x and y represent the numbers of bookcases and TV stands Andrew builds, respectively, then he wants to ...
maximize 60x +100y
subject to ...
The attached graph shows the solution space for these constraints. The profit is maximized at the vertex of the space where the profit function line is farthest from the origin. Andrew maximizes his profit by building ...
Andrew needs to solve a linear programming problem to find how many bookcases and TV stands he should manufacture for optimal profit. This is done by setting up and solving inequalities representing Andrew's time and material cost constraints, graphing the feasible region, and finding the point(s) in this region that yield the highest profit.
This question deals with the topics of linear programming and profit maximisation. Here, Andrew has to decide how much of each type of furniture, bookcases or TV stands, he should produce to maximise profit while considering time and material cost constraints.
From the given conditions, we get two inequalities. The first related to time says that the total number of bookcases and TV stands is less than or equal to 18: let bookcases be x, TV stands be y, thus we have x + y <= 18. The second involving the cost of material says that the total cost spent on materials for both products does not exceed $600: thus, we also have 20x + 40y <= 600.
You can graph these inequalities on the x-y plane to get a visual representation of the possibilities.
Finally, to find the optimal solution (i.e., the highest profit), you calculate the profit function P = 60x + 100y for each point in the feasible region and select the point that provides the highest profit.
#SPJ3
Answer:
The postulate that applied if is an option (b) Congruent -ASA.
Step-by-step explanation:
What is Congruent -ASA?
By the Congruent -ASA rule, two angles in one triangle are congruent with two angles in a second triangle, and if the sides included in both triangles are also congruent, then the triangles are congruent.
Determine the postulate if :
Given:
Here, the answer is obvious from the question,
is LM and MN's Angle.
is PQ and PO's Angle.
Hence, it is ASA.
So, if the angle , then the postulate that is applied is Congruent -ASA.
To learn more about Congruent -ASA here:
B. 9(p + $11.50) = $94.75; p = $5.00
C. 9p + $11.50 = $94.75; p = $11.75
D. 9p + $11.50 = $94.75; p = $9.25
Based on the data provided if the customer went to the shop and bought the potting soil and shrubs with the total bill of $94.75 and the potting soil alone is for $11.50. We can determine the price of the shrubs in total by deducting the 2 values. $94.75 - $11.50 = $83.25. Now that we have the total amount of the shrubs to get the amount of each shrub we then divide the total amount versus the number of shrubs which is 9, ergo $83.25/9 = 9.25 per shrub.
So the answer to this question is:
D. 9p + $11.50 = $94.75 p=$9.25
B. 12x⁵
C. 12x⁶
D. 4x⁵
E. 4x⁶
Can someone explain this one for me?