If an insurance company’s CFO immunizes the company’s balance sheet it will not necessarily remain immunized in six months time because of the following reasons:
This will impact the company's ability to earn income on their investments, which could lead to a decline in the value of the portfolio.
If an insurance company’s CFO immunizes the company’s balance sheet it will not necessarily remain immunized in six months time because of the above reasons.
To know more about CFO, click on the link below:
brainly.com/question/30639658#
#SPJ11
Answer:
B
Explanation:
if you don't want to read all of that
B. impose fine for savings
C. force industries to rehire employees
D. reduce the interest rates
E. import goods and services
Answer:
(D) Reduce interest rates.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes,they can make the contract to buy/sell contingent on the result of an environmental impact report
Explanation:
Being cautious of the welfare of the local community is an example of ethical consideration in business in some countries,while it is a legal and ethical consideration in some other countries, especially the advanced nations of the world.
Little wonders how the cleanup of the contamination caused by BP in 2010 cost the company about $65 billion in restoration and clean up,legal fees as well as settlements paid to affected parties.
Businesses must as point of duty have regard for environmental impact and footprints
B. supply.
C. demand.
D. opportunity cost.
B. increases employment.
C. decreases potential GDP.
D. Both answers A and B are correct.
E. Both answers B and C are correct.
Answer:
The correct answer is option C.
Explanation:
An increase in income tax will cause the disposable income of the consumers to decline. It will thus reduce consumer spending.
A reduction in the demand for goods and services will cause production to decrease. Firms will need fewer workers to produce output so employment will also decline.
This will further cause the aggregate demand and potential GDP to decline.
a) both the Classical dichotomy and the long-run Phillips curve
b) the Classical dichotomy, but not the long run Phillips curve
c) the long-run Phillips curve, but not the Classical dichotomy
d) neither the long-run Phillips curve nor the Classical dichotomy
Answer:
The correct answer is d) neither the long-run Phillips curve nor the Classical dichotomy.
Explanation:
The answer that best suits the situation described is the Phillips curve in the short term but not in the long term.
The Phillips curve starts from the principle that the amount of money circulating (commonly called "money supply") has real effects on the economy in the short term. In this way, an increase in the money supply would have a beneficial effect on aggregate demand, as citizens will spend more when their nominal wages are increased (known as “monetary illusion”) and a more favorable framework for investment and investment will be created. that the prospects of rising prices will improve the expectations of corporate profits. The improvement in aggregate demand would result in greater economic growth, and this in turn in the creation of new jobs. This is how an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment is established, expressed graphically by a downward curve.
The theory of the long-run Phillips Curve, but not the Classical Dichotomy, might imply that the unemployment rate in Flosserland could be above the natural rate due to persistent high inflation.
The correct answer to this question - which posits what would happen if Flosserland has maintained a long term inflation rate of 25% - is (c): the long-run Phillips curve, but not the Classical dichotomy. This conclusion is drawn from understandings of both the Classical Dichotomy and the long-run Phillips Curve.
The Classical Dichotomy is a theoretical construct that assumes a separation between real and nominal variables in an economy, indicating that changes in the money supply only affect nominal variables and wouldn't directly influence real economic factors like unemployment.
Conversely, the long-run Phillips Curve, is vertical suggesting there's no long-run trade-off between unemployment and inflation. In the long-run, changes in the inflation rate would not lead to a change in unemployment from its natural rate. However, if Flosserland has had a long-term high inflation rate, it's possible that expectations have not adapted and therefore unemployment could be above the natural rate. So only the long-run Phillips curve might suggest higher unemployment, but not the Classical dichotomy.
#SPJ3