Simplify the ratio:33 to 44

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: 33/44. You would divide both by their greatest common factor. in this case it would be 11, after dividing you would get 3/4
Answer 2
Answer: 44/33 Just divide the greatest ratio

Your answer is 11.

Related Questions

What is 348,000,000,000,000 estimated as the product of a single digit and a power of 10?
In writing which word means the same as parallel?
Who was the pigs most faithful follower in animal farm
Based on the context of the passage, which word means developed?In the 1860s, a fossil of an avian or flying dinosaur known as Archaeopteryx was found. Scientists identified the fossil as a combination of bird and reptile. This discovery led to the theory that birds evolved from carnivorous avian dinosaurs. Archaeopteryx lived in the southern region of Germany during the Late Jurassic period when Germany had a tropical climate.
Click here to read and refer to "Mary Pickersgill, Flagmaker" in order to answer the question below.Select all that apply.One way to make the overall message of this article more subjective would be to _____.remove the factsinclude inaccurate informationnone of the abovemake more quality statmentsadd more opinions

Write a short poem about anything

Answers

Answer:

the aspen leaves are turning

and the fire in my heart continues burning

a song in my soul

happiness is its goal

and yet the fire continues to reap

and the beauty of fall seems to weep

and the tears continue streaming

and my heart continues screaming

for my love, he cannot see

so in pain, I'll continue to be

and yet my love continues strong

for I feel that nothing has truly gone wrong

for the aspen leaves are falling

and the song in my soul is calling.

Answer:

roses are red violets are blue i thought i was ugly till i saw u

Explanation:

Which of the following wouldn't constitute plagiarism? A. Copying and pasting from an Internet article on pets
B. Paraphrasing an article from a medical journal
C. Constructing a personal narrative without research
D. Borrowing idea structure from an essay on hockey

Answers

Constructing a personal narrative without research wouldn't constitute plagiarism. Therefore, option C is correct.

What is plagiarism?

The act of presenting someone else's ideas or work as your own, with or without that person's consent, by incorporating it into your work without giving it due credit, is known as plagiarism. This definition applies to all works, both published and unpublished, whether they are in manuscript, print, or electronic form.

It is unethical in the first place since it is a sort of theft. You are stealing someone else's intellectual property when you use their words and ideas and claim them to be your own. Second, it is unethical because the person who copied the work went on to profit from the theft.

Thus, constructing a personal narrative without research wouldn't constitute plagiarism. Therefore, option C is correct.

Learn more about plagiarism, here:

brainly.com/question/24405302

#SPJ2

constitute means include, and plagiarism is using someone else' work without credit. Based on your answer choices, I would go with c or B, since narratives do not require quotes of any kind, but if you paraphrase someone else' work, you are still using their ideas, so B would not be it.

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World. You could date a great change in the world to a visit one Madame Villeneuve made to France in 1714. That year, Pauline, an enslaved woman from the Caribbean, arrived in France as the personal servant of her mistress. When Madame Villeneuve set off from the coast to visit Paris, she left Pauline in a convent. The young woman spent her time studying with the nuns and went so far in her training that she asked to become a nun herself and remain in the convent. The nuns agreed, which enraged Madame Villeneuve. She rushed to a judge, demanding to have her property back. Was Pauline a free woman, a bride of Christ, or an item to be bought, sold, and warehoused when she was not in use? Twenty-three years earlier, King Louis XIV had issued a set of rules that defined slavery as legal in the French sugar islands. But when two slaves managed to reach France, he freed them—saying they became free "as soon as they [touched] the soil" of France. The judges sided with Pauline—she was real to them, human, not a piece of property. For Pauline's judges, as for King Louis, slavery far off across the seas was completely different from enslaved individuals in France. Slave owners fought back, arguing that owners should be able to list their slaves as property when they arrived in France and take them with them when they left. Though most parts of France agreed to this, law­makers in Paris hesitated. Pierre Lemerre the Younger made the case for the slaves. "All men are equal," he insisted in 1716—exactly sixty years before the Declaration of Independence. To say that "all men are equal" in 1716, when slavery was flourishing in every corner of the world and most eastern Europeans themselves were farmers who could be sold along with the land they worked, was like announcing that there was a new sun in the sky. In the Age of Sugar, when slavery was more brutal than ever before, the idea that all humans are equal began to spread—toppling kings, overturning governments, transforming the entire world. How do the details in the passage support the central idea? A)They compare the end of slavery in the French colonies with the end of slavery in other colonies.
B)They provide details about the final few years of slavery in Europe and its many colonies.
C)They provide examples of how laws and attitudes about equality changed in France.
D) They explain why enslaved people entered convents in an attempt to gain their freedom.

Answers

The correct option is C) “They provide examples of how laws and attitudes about equality changed in France.” In the passage there are several examples of how people in France had different views and attitudes towards slavery, especially King Louis XIV, who freed two slaves when they reached French soil, judges that took the Pauline case, and Pierre Lemerre the Younger  in 1716 with the idea that all men are equal.

Option A is incorrect since the passage does not compare slavery in France and other colonies

Option B is also incorrect since it does not refer to the final years of slavery

And option D is also incorrect since it did not focus on the slaves entering the convent to be free; the example of Pauline was used to describe how slavery was seen in France.  


Answer:

c

Explanation:

Which sentence contains a pun?a. A humble life of peace and quiet is better than a splendid one with danger and risk.
b. It is better to be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and erase all doubt.
c. I could not remember how to throw a boomerang, but it eventually came back to me.
d.She shimmied on the shiny dance floor in her sheer and shimmery shoes.

Answers

The answer would be C. Boomerangs, when thrown, are made to circle back to the user who threw it. The pun is a play on their memory returning to them just as a boomerang would come back to them.

The anwer to the question above would be that the sentence that contains a pun is the following one: I could not remember how to throw a boomerang, but it eventually came back to me.

In order to understand the pun, you need to know what the meaning of "boomerang" is. A boomerang is "a curve stick that, when throw in a particular way, comes back to the person who threw it". Here the pun has to do with the fact that memories can also come back to you, just as boomerangs do.

In which sentence is incantation used incorrectly? A. No amount of incantation persuaded my parents to let me see my graduation present before the day. B. The priestess uttered an incantation to summon the Greek goddess Artemis. C. As the fortune-teller murmured an incantation we waited to learn the future. D. The three withes in Macbeth toss strange objects into the boiling pot,chanting an incantation : "Double ,double toil and trouble;/ Fire brunch, and cauldron bubble.

Answers

A. No amount of incantation persuaded my parents to let me see my graduation present before the day.

Final answer:

The sentence in which incantation is used incorrectly is A. 'No amount of incantation persuaded my parents to let me see my graduation present before the day.'

Explanation:

The sentence in which incantation is used incorrectly is A. "No amount of incantation persuaded my parents to let me see my graduation present before the day."

An incantation refers to a spoken or sung formula of words that is believed to have magical or supernatural power. In this sentence, incantation is used incorrectly because it implies that the speaker attempted to persuade someone using a magical or supernatural spell, which is not the correct meaning of incantation. The correct word in this context would be "persuasion" or "convincing".

Learn more about Correct use of incantation in a sentence here:

brainly.com/question/39277954

#SPJ12

A borrowed word which has been made to resemble English has been _____. ameliorized pejorized technologized Anglicized

Answers

A borrowed word which has been made to resemble English has been???
It is the anglicized

the correct answer is anglicized.