(5 pt) supersede
A.
to be aware of
B.
to come before
C.
to seek out
D.
to take the place of
The answer is
She may have a better understanding of the text, since she has insight to every character’s thoughts and feelings
A third-person point of view can be omniscient, in which the narrator knows all of the thoughts and feelings of all of the characters in the story,
Rainsford’s response to Zaroff indicates that he is opposed to the idea of hunting humans.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
"I can't believe you are serious, General Zaroff. This is a grisly joke" (emphasize added)
"Hunting? General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder" (emphasize added)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hope this helps
Hey there! :D
In the story "The Most Dangerous Game," the general is hunting down humans for sport. In response to this confession, Rainsford says that hunting down humans is murder. We can eliminate any answer choice that has a positive correlation to what the general is saying. He wouldn't join Zaroff in hunting humans if he thought it was murder. He doesn't think it's right either.
We are left with two options. One elaborates that Rainsford is opposed to hunting humans, and the other is that he does not understand why Zaroff is hunting humans. What goes along with what Rainsford's dialogue is saying more than the other? Well, Rainsford doesn't understand why the General is hunting humans. 'This is a grisly joke.' But, he clearly states that he thinks that hunting humans is considered murder. And he clearly expresses the idea that he is very opposed to it. I think the best answer choice is:
"Rainsford's response to Zaroff indicates that... he is opposed to the idea of hunting humans."
I hope this helps!
~kaikers