Does the police officer have the right to search theirbag?

O No. The Fourth Amendment requires
to have a good reason for a search.
O Yes. Police officers are able to search anyone who looks suspicious.
O Yes. Police officers can search anyone at any time.
O No. The Eighth Amendment grants protection from
cruel and unusual punishment.

hey there! viewing settlement patterns in colonial mexico is the correct answer. have a great day!!

Answer:

viewing settlement patterns in colonial mexico

Explanation:

President Zachary Taylor’s top priority as president was preserving the Union.

Who  was President Zachary Taylor?

Zachary Taylor was born on November 24, 1784 in Montebello plantation, near Gordonsville, U.S and died on July 9, 1850, Washington, D.C, he was the 12th president of the United States from 1849 to 50. Zachary Taylor was the  general and national hero in the United States Army from the time of the Mexican-American War and the War of 1812. He was against the institution of slavery in new American colonies. He was torn on whether or not to endorse the Wilmot Proviso, a rider that forbade slavery in any area that the United States later annexed from Mexico as a result of the Mexican-American War.

What is mean by Preserving the union ?

Here the term ''Preserving the Union'' is associated with President Abraham Lincoln but president Zachary Taylor also work for preserving the Union. he was born in a wealthy family and had the slaves but he never support the slavery an in the Mexico war he emerge as a hero and because of this instance he was became 12th president of America. when he was president of America his motive was Preserving the union by armed force rather then compromise.

hence option A, is correct.

to learn more about President Zachary Taylor here

brainly.com/question/4490446

#SPJ2

The answer for this question is the first one. Preserving the Union.

Answer:

Gandhi's purpose was to fight for the freedom of India from Great Britain using non-violence. He also wanted to advance the idea of satyagraha, or passive resistance, to help oppressed people

Explanation:

Answer:

all

Explanation:

Answer:

Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its concern is mentioned.

Explanation:

• Through me, the demand for amounts of unhealthy food seems to be inelastic in terms of costs. I acknowledge that as the cost goes up, consumers will consume less junk food, but perhaps the decrease in the supply is lower than that of the rising rise. It might be because, already though, substitutes for junk foods, particularly across the Us, are challenging to find. Unhealthy food is just the shortest and simplest meal to consume.
• The reasoning here seems to be that every customer would have to purchase food even though the price rises by 1%, so consumption will still decrease by somewhere around 1%. So perhaps we can assume that quality does not influence quantities throughout the Junk Food industry.
• The reduction of excess baggage would be small since it is inelastic. This symbolizes the corporation's low incompetence and as the cost is changed, the market for quantities is approximately the same, not so much impact.
• I thought taxing junk foods, especially to maximize welfare spending, is a smart option. But obesity over here Is not going to help. The incorrect method for combating obesity as well as making our diets balanced is taxes. The irony is that all clients are impacted by taxes regardless of their weight status. The impact of food taxes is unclear and may result in the replacement of items that may comprise of calories that seem to be equivalent or higher.

Final answer:

The demand for junk food is typically inelastic, meaning a small price increase from a tax wouldn't significantly reduce demand. The deadweight loss would be relatively small. A junk food tax could potentially promote healthier choices, but it's not guaranteed to lower obesity levels alone.

Explanation:

The demand for junk food is generally seen as inelastic because these are often low-cost pleasure products that many consumers are willing to purchase even with a slight increase in price. The price elasticity of demand refers to how sensitive the quantity demanded of a good is to a change in its price. In the case of junk food, a small price increase may not significantly reduce demand.

The deadweight loss refers to the inefficient allocation of resources, in this case resulting from the imposition of a tax. For an inelastic demand good like junk food, the deadweight loss would be relatively small because the quantity demanded does not decrease significantly with an increase in price. However, the impact on obesity rates is not clear cut since it also depends on people's dietary choices and lifestyle habits.

Implementing a junk food tax could be a good measure in incentivizing healthier choices, but it's not the only solution. The overall effect would also heavily depend on supplementary measures, like education on healthy eating and promotion of physical activity. Therefore, simply taxing junk food might not significantly reduce the number of obese people in the United States.

Learn more about Junk Food Tax and Obesity here:

brainly.com/question/35137577

#SPJ3

Answer:girl sum

Explanation:

Ion k