THE ANSWER IS FALSE-------------------
Answer:
12 second
Explanation:
According to my research on Driving Safety, I can say that based on the information provided within the question in an intermediate risk driving environment you should maintain at least a 12 second space between cars.
Intermediate risk driving is an environment that includes controlled intersections and normal traffic in which cars are traveling less than 55 miles per hour
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
In an intermediate risk driving environment, a driver should maintain a 15- to 20-second scan ahead of the vehicle and keep a safe buffer zone around the vehicle, much like how an approaching ambulance siren alerts one to clear its path.
In an intermediate risk driving environment, it's generally advised to maintain a 15- to 20-second search in front of your vehicle. This means you should be scanning the road and your surroundings to anticipate potential hazards about 15 to 20 seconds ahead of where your vehicle currently is. Along with this, you should keep an effective space cushion or buffer zone around your vehicle to safely react to unexpected situations. Just like how you would be able to hear a Doppler shift in an ambulance siren, indicating its approach and whether you need to pull over, a similar alertness is needed for detecting and reacting to potential risks while driving.
#SPJ6
c. midlife transition
b. menopause
d. empty nest
Answer:C
Explanation:
Answer:
natural and probable consequence
Explanation:
The natural and probable consequence doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct.
The natural and probable consequence doctrine states that an individual who aided another in committing a crime is liable for the crime committed and also for other related crimes which resulted in the process of committing that crime. For example, if an individual aids another the crime of home invasion and in the process occupants of the house where assaulted, according to the natural and probable consequence doctrine, the abettor is guilty of home invasion, assault even though he/she was not physically involved in the assault.