The tram is a means of passenger transport that circulates on rails and on the surface in urban areas, on the streets themselves, often without separation from the rest of the traffic, without a track or a reserved area.
The tram had a considerable development between the beginning of the 20th century and the interwar period with the innovation of electric traction, the multiplication of the lines and the increase in the number of passengers, becoming the main urban transport. The transport by horse had disappeared practically of all the European and American cities around 1910, and the buses still were in phase of development, increasing their mechanical reliability, but still they did not surpass the tram in benefits, whereas the automobile was still (for little time) reserved for a limited clientele. A great benefit of this type of means of transport was Improvement in the concession of economic centers with urban centers and residential areas.
Answer:
c) A well-prepared fallback position in case the project cannot be executed as imagined.
Explanation:
B. diversity
C. diffusion
D. drawback
Answer:
Had sustained very little destruction.
Explanation:
The south was experiencing total war. the north was fine.
There was a conflict of religion versus science at theScopes Trial because the teaching of evolution where man was said to come fromanimals was against the Biblical origin of man. At the time, it was not allowedto teach that theory. This began adebate of whether or not to teach evolution in high school and it challenged the Christian origins ofman.
The Scopes Trial of 1925 showcased the clash between religion and science in early 20th-century America. The trial arose from a violation of Tennessee's Butler Act which forbade teaching evolution, pitting rural traditionalists against progressive urbanites. This tension illustrated a broader national conflict between religious fundamentalism and scientific modernism.
The Scopes Trial, also known as the Monkey Trial, occurred in 1925 and highlighted the conflict between science and religion in that era. The trial revolved around John Scopes, a high school substitute teacher who was accused of teaching evolution in violation of Tennessee's Butler Act. This Act forbade the teaching of any theory that denied the biblical story of Creation.
The legal teams represented the clash of two worldviews. William Jennings Bryan, a fundamentalist Christian who believed in a literal interpretation of the Bible, argued for the prosecution. The defence was headed by Clarence Darrow, a known agnostic and advocate for modernism and scientific discovery. Darrow's questioning of Bryan was designed to undermine the rigid literal interpretation of the Bible and promote a receptive approach towards scientific theories.
This high-profile trial landed on national headlines, with its detailed coverage revealing a deep chasm in American society; it showed a divide between the more liberal, progressive urban population who embraced scientific advancement, and the rural population who clung to traditional Christian beliefs. The Scopes Trial brought to the forefront the inevitable clash between science and religion when scientific discoveries challenge longstanding religious beliefs.
#SPJ11