When Congress issued the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, how did that contribute to upsetting the checks-and-balances system?
What would happen if any of the three branches (executive, judicial, or legislative) were to greatly exceed its authority under the Constitution? (Pick one)
Answer:
The Warren Court made decisions regarding segregation and civil liberties. The most famous court decision was Brown v. Board of Education which ended school segregation in America and began a wave of desegregation decisions. These decisions created uproar in the South and cause military intervention at times. Miranda v. Arizona was another famous Warren Court decision which better defined the Fifth Amendment and how a person must be informed on their rights when arrested. These cases were often racial in nature redefining civil liberties and due process of the law.Yes the Warren Court did exceed its boundaries in issuing some of its decisions during the 1960s. For example the court gave its decision regarding women suffrage and it was not taken well by many women of that time. Many women were forced to suffer the consequences of the decision given by the Warren Court in regards to women's suffrage.The Tonkin Gulf Resolution was a joint resolution which the United States Congress passed on August 7, 1964. It gave power to the president to use conventional military force without declaration of war. It basically gave more power to the president then checks and balances allow. In this case for the given question let us assume that it was the executive branch that had taken fore step and became more powerful. If such had happened the power resting upon the head of the society or the president would increase and the chances of being mistake in due to the presence of human emotions and flaws would come into action. The decisions taken by the agencies would be biased and hence the laws that would be made would not necessarily benefits the society. When the US Constitution was written, the States feared a strong Federal Government. Because of the three branches system the US Constitution created a new system that revolutionized Constitutions around the world: the Checks and Balances system. The Checks and Balances system is a system that the US Constitution created to give powers to each of those three branches to limit the power of the other branch. Each branch has typical and atypical powers, and those atypical powers are the ones that are used to limit the typical powers of other branches. Because of that, if any of the three branches exceeds its authority the other branches have the power to stop this power and return the thing to status quo ante. Example of this atypical powers is: The Power of Veto the President has, the Impeachment Power of the Congress and Power the judicial branch has to declare a law unconstitutional. As you can notice, the Constitution created a system that autoregulates itself so that power and democracy are stable. The Warren Court has caused social change but one thing that the warren court has impacted positivily is that it broadened the individual rights of accused criminals. yes there is ups and downs to the warren court and it was a big thing in the 19th century but remembering on how of a impact it was has gave us importance today because any case that had segregation and enough evidence was presented, then a law for segregation would be unconstitutional.
Explanation:
The while Salmon Brown's account can provide insights into John Brown's intentions, it should be approached with caution and considered in the context of potential biases, limited perspective, and motivations.
Evaluating the trustworthiness of Salmon Brown's account as a source for learning about John Brown's intentions requires careful consideration.
Salmon Brown was John Brown's son and, as such, may have personal biases and limited perspectives that can influence the reliability of his account.
Here are some factors to consider:
**1. Bias and Subjectivity:** Salmon Brown may have had a personal and emotional attachment to his father's actions and cause.
This bias could lead to a potentially one-sided or idealized portrayal of John Brown's intentions.
He may have wanted to honor his father's memory and justify his actions.
**2. Limited Perspective:** As John Brown's son, Salmon may not have had access to all of his father's thoughts, plans, or intentions.
He may not have been privy to private conversations or inner motivations that could provide a more complete picture.
**3. Timing and Recollection:** The account's reliability may be affected by the passage of time and the fallibility of human memory.
Salmon Brown's recollection of events and conversations may have been influenced by time and personal interpretations.
**4. Corroborating Evidence:** To assess trustworthiness, it is essential to compare Salmon Brown's account with other historical sources and accounts from that period.
Corroborating evidence from multiple sources can enhance the reliability of the information.
**5. Motivations:** Consider Salmon Brown's motivations for providing this account.
Was he attempting to shape public opinion, defend his father's legacy, or offer a more balanced perspective?
To gain a comprehensive understanding of John Brown's intentions, it is advisable to consult a range of historical sources and viewpoints to ensure a more well-rounded and accurate portrayal of this historical figure and his actions.
For similar questions on Salmon Brown's account
#SPJ1
The invention of movable print and rapidly-produced books is an example of cultural and technological development during the Song Dynasty.
This period, which lasted from the 10th to the 13th century, saw significant advancements in areas such as literature, art, and science.
Movable print allowed for the mass production of books, which was a major technological breakthrough and had a significant impact on the spread of knowledge and literacy in China.
This development was made possible by the use of woodblock printing, which had been used in China for centuries prior to the Song Dynasty.
However, movable print allowed for greater flexibility and efficiency in the printing process. The availability of printed books also contributed to the growth of a reading public and helped to establish the importance of written language in Chinese culture.
To know more about Song Dynasty, refer here:
#SPJ11
Answer:
Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers because he believed that it prevented any one person or any one branch of government from having too much power.
Further details:
Introduction:
Montesquieu was the French political philosopher whose principle work “The spirit of laws” was major contribution to political history.
Why Montesquieu advocated the separation of powers:
• Montesquieu supported for the separation of powers because he believed that it stopped any one person or any one branch of government from having too much power. The legislative, judicial, and executive branches were to function individualistically of each other, with equal power distributed to each. This idea was very significant for political theories associated to the development of fairness. The separation of powers is an idea in many constitutions, such as the constitution of the United States.
• Montesquieu advocated the separation of powers to keep each division of government in balance. Legislative, judicial and executive powers had to separate from each other because a corporation between any two branches would abolish the third. He specified the case of Louis XIV who united all this powers under him and became a dictatorial ruler.
Answer details:
Subject: History
Level: High school
Keywords:
• Montesquieu
• The spirit of law
• Separation of powers
Learn more to evaluate:
Montesquieu advocated the separation of powersto limit the power of any single group or person.
Further Explanations:
Montesquieu supported power split-up because of his belief that a person or an institution should not be granted full authority. The legislative, jurisdictive, and executive divisions should function independently without being intervened by each other. His theories kept each division in balance and helped to institute an ideal administration. As per his ideas of separation, there should be no absolute authority in the administration and this would help to bring up a multiple viewpoint in a law-making process.
Baron de Montesquieu a French philosopher and Judge accredited for securing the word absolutism in a political legacy. His theories are the primary source of the hypothesis of separation of power of the constitution prevalent in numerous nations. He is also accredited for being a progenitor including Tacitus and Herodotus of anthropology. Indeed he was also known to be the initiator of scientific enterprise executing social and cultural anthropology. He was too much prejudiced by the enlightenment theories and its policies.
Learn more
1. If Serbia had used the term “murder” rather than “ethnic cleansing” to describe its actions against Muslims, it is likely that they would have?brainly.com/question/4837719
2. In-state court, a losing party can appeal a case if a jury is unable to make a decision. a judge disagrees with a jury’s decision. a precedent does not exist. a higher court agrees to hear it.? brainly.com/question/2416938
3. How did the battle of Okinawa affect President Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb against Japan? brainly.com/question/1323522
Answer Details:
Grade: High school
Subject: US History
Chapter: Baron de Montesquieu
Keywords: Baron de Montesquieu, French philosopher,political legacy, hypothesis, Tacitus ,Herodotus, social , cultural anthropology, enlightenment theories, legislative, jurisdictive, executive,