The statement that accurately describes the historical significance of Mehmed II and Süleyman the Magnificent is A. The conquests of Mehmed II established the Ottoman Empire, whereas the conquests of Süleyman the Magnificent expanded the Ottoman Empire to its greatest size.
This refers to the act of defeating a thing or person in different ways and exerting dominion over them.
Hence, we can see that Mehmed II and Süleyman the Magnificent had significant contributions to the Ottoman Empire and they both established and expanded it as contained in option A.
Read more about Süleyman the Magnificent here:
#SPJ1
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
The conquests of Mehmed II established the Ottoman Empire, whereas the conquests of Süleyman the Magnificent expanded the Ottoman Empire to its greatest size.
deficit reduction
universal health care
welfare reform
b. Burma.
c. Thailand.
d. Indonesia.
b. to prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia
c. to protect Japan and the Philippines from communist attacks
d. to prove that the United States was more powerful than China
The answer is: b. to prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia
After the Geneva Accords divided Vietnam into South and North Vietnam, a group called the Vietcong started a war against the South Vietnam government. Meanwhile, America was sending supplies and a small amount of troops to South Vietnam to support the new democratic country. However, when the communist North Vietnamese defending boats attacked American destroyers, it caused a war with North Vietnam. The US also got involved to stop communism from expanding from North to South Vietnam.
Answer: To prevent the spread of communism in southeast Asia
Explanation: I got it correct on the test
B. Delaware
C. Georgia
D. Rhode Island
C. ruled against the principle of affirmative action.
D. ruled in favor of affirmative action within specified limits.
Correct answer:
Details:
The Supreme Court's decision gave some credence to Allan Bakke's claim that the University of California at Davis had practiced some amount of reverse discrimination in denying him admittance to the medical school because he was not an economically or educationally disadvantaged member of one of four racial/ethnic groups eligible for their special admission program. But the Court was careful to note that race could be considered as a factor (among many factors) in college admissions, if schools practiced great care in doing so. Having a basic quota system, such as UC Davis reserving 16 spots out of 100 each year, was considered discriminatory.
The essence of the decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was that the Court upheld affirmative action. It allowed race to be considered as one of several factors in college admission policy. But establishing specific racial quotas was an approach that the Court said was not allowable.