The correct answer is C) a special one year tax pays for building new schools.
The scenario that best shows how local taxes support the economy is "a special one year tax pays for building new schools."
Local taxes support the economy because they often pay for road repair, firefighters, police officers. These services create jobs and help society run smoothly.
The local authority is responsible for asses and collects local taxes. It comes from property taxes and funds important public services that allow a community to function and operate with no problems. Examples of these services are the garbage collection, new schools, the salary of policemen and firefighters, the maintenance of good road conditions, sewer maintenance, among many others.
If people pay their taxes in time, the money collected is applied to the creation of jobs to help the county or municipality to be administered in the correct way.
It made clothing more expensive to produce.
It increased demands for worker compensation.
It drove down the cost of producing clothing
The right impact of the mechanical production system from the given choices is: It drove down the expense of creating clothing. Thusly, choice (D) is right.
The sequential construction system is an assembling interaction that includes separating the creation of an item into a progression of normalized and monotonous undertakings, each performed by an alternate laborer or machine. This strategy, spearheaded by Henry Passage in the mid twentieth hundred years, changed assembling and made a few impacts.
By utilizing the sequential construction system, organizations had the option to build efficiency and effectiveness, which prompted decreased creation costs. This, thus, took into consideration the large scale manufacturing of merchandise at a lower cost for each unit. With regards to dress creation, the sequential construction system assisted with driving down the expense of delivering clothing, making it more reasonable and open to a bigger populace.
Learn more about clothing, from:
#SPJ2
The United States v. Fields case ended up on a federal death sentence imposed on Fields for commitig a federal capital offense.
This sentence was made largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could predict Fields would be a risk to society in the future.
The problem here is that the psychiatrist issued this crucial testimony without doing any testing or offering any objective empirical data whatsoever.
To this day, there's still much debate involving how a Court can determine risk to society or future violence from an individual, in a safe and reliable manner that reaches necessary standards for a case of such magnitude assessing death penalty.
Hope this helps!