Answer:
This question has nothing to do with current events, it has to do with the US-Mexican War that happened in the mid to late 1800's.
Explanation:
This is a viewpoint question, so you have to answer it how you feel. Was the US right to declare war? Was Santa Ana correct in cutting off peace talks with the US? Was he right when he attacked the Texans at the Alamo? Could the US have gotten the territory that we know as Texas, Arizona, Utah, Colorado, Utah in a peaceful way?
Hi there!
So, we're trying to figure out what the term 'Cold War' has in common. Well, its obvious that war isn't nothing to be joyful about. Neither is cold, because they're both very dark and chaotic. For example: if you were out in war and your constantly fighting hoping you'll make it in one piece and its all feels so cold and so alarming that all of it could make you feel as if you have to be on a look out every 24/7.
Hope this helps!
-WolfieWolfFromSketch
Answer:
They wanted to guarantee personal freedoms
Explanation:
Answer:
Federalists argued that the constitution did not need the bill of rights, because the people of the states kept any power not given to the federal government. Anti Federalists held that the bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty. *do not copy this was looked up(above)*
They did not want the federal government to have too much power. Like the monarchy they left in England(one person haveing all the power). They wanted their individual rights to be 'safe'.
B)civil prosecution.
C)community service.
D)criminal prosecution.
The type of prosecution that Barney is subject to when the Minister sues him for the accident is B)civil prosecution.
Civil Prosecution refers to legal proceedings that a brought against someone because the people involved have a dispute among them.
The Minister has a dispute with Barney and so any suit by the Minister would be a civil prosecution.
Find out more on civil prosecution at brainly.com/question/1065754.
#SPJ2