Which of the following would be against the Constitution?Congress declares war on a country, and the president sends troops.
Canada and the United States meet to create a new trade agreement.
Connecticut voters select two senators to represent them in Congress.
California begins to coin and print currency for use within the state.

Historians often praise Thomas Jefferson for incorporating the Enlightenment into the Declaration of Independence. Which of these BEST explains why this can be said?

How did mass production change the roles in the workplace?Select one:
a. The work once done by apprentices was now done only by skilled craftsmen.
b. The work once done by skilled workers was now done by machines and unskilled workers.
c. Skilled workers who could use machines were now in more demand than unskilled workers.
d. Skilled workers now took on more unskilled workers as apprentices to learn their trades.
Question 25

I have a 93 as a grade in my class right now. I got an 88% on a quiz. whats my new grade now in that class?

Who wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Women, advocating women's right to vote and hold public office?Olympe de Gouges
Emily Davison
Marie Antoinette
Mary Wollstonecraft

What major change following the Reformation occurred in the 16th century in Europe?a.
There was a decline in the production of art.
b.
A war between the Catholics and Protestants occurred.
c.
There was a major division between Catholicism and Protestantism throughout Europe.
d.
all of the abovE

State of the Union speech –Andrew Jackson Source: Andrew Jackson, State of the Union speech. December 6, 1830. The present policy of the Government is but a continuation of the same progressive change by a milder process. The tribes which occupied the countries now constituting the Eastern States were annihilated or have melted away to make room for the whites. The waves of population and civilization are rolling to the westward, and we now propose to acquire the countries occupied by the red men of the South and West by a fair exchange, and, at the expense of the United States, to send them to a land where their existence may be prolonged and perhaps made perpetual. Doubtless it will be painful to leave the graves of their fathers; but what do they more than our ancestors did or than our children are now doing?.... Can it be cruel in this Government when, by events which it can not control, the Indian is made discontented in his ancient home to purchase his lands, to give him a new and extensive territory, to pay the expense of his removal, and support him a year in his new abode? How many thousands of our own people would gladly embrace the opportunity of removing to the West on such conditions! If the offers made to the Indians were extended to them, they would be hailed with gratitude and joy.... Rightly considered, the policy of the General Government toward the red man is not only liberal, but generous. He is unwilling to submit to the laws of the States and mingle with their population. To save him from this alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation, the General Government kindly offers him a new home, and proposes to pay the whole expense of his removal and settlement. It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly 30 years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation. Two important tribes have accepted the provision made for their removal at the last session of Congress, and it is believed that their example will induce the remaining tribes also to seek the same obvious advantages.... Humanity has often wept over the fate of the aborigines of this country, and Philanthropy has been long busily employed in devising means to avert it, but its progress has never for a moment been arrested, and one by one have many powerful tribes disappeared from the earth. To follow to the tomb the last of his race and to tread on the graves of extinct nations excite melancholy reflections. But true philanthropy reconciles the mind to these vicissitudes as it does to the extinction of one generation to make room for another.... Philanthropy could not wish to see this continent restored to the condition in which it was found by our forefathers. What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and ranged by a few thousand savages to our extensive Republic, studded with cities, towns, and prosperous farms, embellished with all the improvements which art can devise or industry execute, occupied by more than 12;000;000 happy people, and filled with all the blessings of liberty, civilization, and religion?....
Questions:
1. Close Reading: Why would he say, “Humanity has often wept over the fate of the aborigines of this country,” if he supports Indian Removal?
2. Close Reading: Why does Jackson think the United States was better in 1830 than in 1609?
3. Close Reading: Why does Jackson think his policy is kind and generous? Do you agree?