The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? I scarcely believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are citizens, and no State has a right to make any new law, or to enforce any old law, which shall abridge their privileges or immunities. Hence, every discrimination against women in the constitutions and laws of the several States is today null and void precisely as is every one against negroes. -Susan B. Anthony. "Speech After Being Convicted of Voting

How does the use of a rhetorical question in this passage most clearly strengthen Susan B. Anthony's speech?

A. By having the audience focus on the central purpose of the speech
B. By giving the audience convincing evidence that they can't deny
C. By allowing the audience to for their own opinions
D. By making Susan B. Anthony sound as if she doesn't know what she's talking about​

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

I think its B but I can be wrong

I hope this helps!


Related Questions

29. What tone is common in Victorian Gothic poetry?O O lighthearted morbid sarcastic nostalgic
Walter was impressed with the rabbit hutch Sarah had built. He said her construction skills were admirable.
This is for all the middle schoolers out there. i am going to be making a group for the one that need help so you guys can help each other out. I can probably help depending what the subject is and this group is limited so only 10 people can come and if you think you can help out please join thank you for taking your time to read this and have a nice day
Read the following scene from Trifles.COUNTY ATTORNEY. Let’s talk about that later, Mr. Hale. I do want to talk about that, but tell now just what happened when you got to the house. HALE. I didn’t hear or see anything; I knocked at the door, and still it was all quiet inside. I knew they must be up, it was past eight o’clock. So I knocked again, and I thought I heard somebody say, “Come in.” I wasn’t sure, I’m not sure yet, but I opened the door—this door (indicating the door by which the two women are still standing), and there in that rocker—(pointing to it) sat Mrs. Wright. (They all look at the rocker.) What would be one advantage of watching this scene as opposed to reading it?
The main conflict in the story is called the

Thomas Garrett was an important person in the underground railroad. The narrator of "Harriet Tubman" describes his appearance, his character, and his actions. What do those actions reveal about Garrett? What do those details reveal about Garrett?

Answers

Thomas Garrett was described as a fearless benefactor who helped slaves to escape. Harriet Tubman received from him not only clothes, food or money, but also was witness and friend of numerous escapes she organized to free family and friends. Thomas Garret was a smart man whose abolitionist position was evident since early years. He was a man willing to risk his own safety and monetary means to help slaves and to fight against oppression.

After you have read the background information about Kevin Tillman and his brother Pat and Kevin'sfull speech, reread the provided excerpt to answer the question.
Which element of credibility best applies to Kevin Tillman's claim?
a. Neutrality - because he was not lied about himself, he has no vested interest
O b. Expertise -because he studied the law and knows the legal consequences of the case
O c. Motive - because he wants to bring truth to light and stop the harmful lies
O d. Bias - because he is anti-government and wants to embarrass Congress

Answers

Final answer:

Kevin Tillman's claim is best exemplified by the element of neutrality.


Explanation:

The element of credibility that best applies to Kevin Tillman's claim is neutrality. His lack of vested interest in the case, as he was not directly lied about, adds to his credibility. It shows that his motive is not personal gain or revenge, but rather to bring truth to light and stop harmful lies.


Learn more about credibility in Kevin Tillman's claim here:

brainly.com/question/36618791


Refer to the Newsela article "PRO/CON: Should We Abolish the Electoral College?"Part A

Read the text under the heading "PRO: Let's Give All Voters an Equal Voice."

Which claim does the author make as a pro for doing away with the Electoral College.


The way the federal government is set up ensures that the minority has a voice.

The popular vote determines the winner in a presidential election.

The Senate and the House of Representatives have an equal voice in shaping government.

It is important to ensure that small states have an equal voice.

Answers

Answer:

Answer A:The Electoral College potentially throws off the balance established in the legislative branch by the Constitution. Answer B:No, because it explains how the legislative branch creates balance under the Constitution.

Explanation:

Answer:

Part A: The way the federal government is set up ensures that the minority has a voice.

Part B:  Yes, because it provides an example of the way in which the federal government gives smaller states a voice.

Explanation:

correct answers

: brainly.com/question/25752380?referrer=searchResults

What would you do if you have 10 million dollars? (5 points)What do you want for Christmast? (5 points)

Answers

Answer:

If i had 10 million dollars i would help family and friends who are struggling, would move out of my house and buy a cottage with my boyfriend. I would spend lots of money redesigning my house to make it perfect for me. O=I would buy a monkey, some dogs, cats, fish, lizards, birds, and a pig (we are animal lovers) i would start a buisness probably creating and selling clothes, and i would donate, and put some in savings for my future kids colleges and cars. I would also buy lots of clothes lol and travel all over the world with my boyfriend And save up for our wedding

for Christmas want mostly clothes, candles, makeup, and maybe some shoes

Explanation:

Answer:

I would donate some for a good cause. I would put some in a savings acount. I would go SHOPPING. I would buy a new house overlooking a wonderful view. I would by so many snacks to fill my new houses pantry. I would pay for other people’s meals (like in fast food restaurants I would tell the person at the window that I want to pay for the people behind me). I would go TRAVEL. I would buy some Chick-Fil-A.

For Christmas I want new sweatpants and some shoes. :)

Which sentence from The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone explains why Napoleon and his men were temporarily trapped in Egypt in 1798?Napoleon’s army captured the city of Alexandria by storm on July 1, 1798, and rapidly overran the Nile Delta.
On August 1 the British surprised the French fleet at anchor near Alexandria and completely destroyed it.
For the next year, the army fended off [resisted] attacks by the Turks, who had formerly ruled Egypt.
Then, in August 1799, Napoleon evaded [escaped] the British naval blockade and returned with a new companion to France to deal with problems there.

Please help fast!!

Answers

The sentence from "The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone" that explains why Napoleon and his men were temporarily trapped in Egypt in 1798 is:

B. On August 1, the British surprised the French fleet at anchor near Alexandria and completely destroyed it.

  • "The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone" is a book by Jame Cross Giblin in which the author tells the story of how the Rosetta Stone was discovered and deciphered.
  • It was the Rosetta Stone that helped scholars finally understand Egyptian hieroglyphs.
  • The stone was discovered by the French army in Egypt. Napoleon and his men had stayed there, temporarily trapped.
  • The reason is that the British army surprised the Frenchfleet and destroyed it, which prevented the French from leaving.
  • With the information above in mind, we can choose letter B as the best option.

Learn more about the topic here:

brainly.com/question/15961332

Answer:

Answer: On August 1st the British surprised the French fleet at anchor near Alexandria and completely destroyed it. Or B.

Explanation:

Read this excerpt from an argumentative essay.One explanation for why the national parks are so important is that they provide many Americans with the opportunity to experience wildlife in its natural habitat. Every major city in the United States has a zoo, which is great, but how much more significant is the sight of a brown bear in its natural setting rather than in a cage? A trip to a park like Yellowstone National Park may be the only chance a youngster from a place like New York City or Chicago will have to behold such a sight. If we, the American people, were to lose places like Yellowstone, it would be a travesty.

Where in an argumentative essay does this excerpt belong?

in the opening
in the body, as a reason
in the body, addressing a counterclaim
in the closing

Answers

In the body as a reason, is your answer sweetie. This is because the paragraph starts out with the words one explanation which signifies that this would be a reason.

Answer:b in the body, as a reason

Explanation: