Explanation:
This post will provide the answers for the other questions posted (please see the included links for information).
According to the formatting guidelines under the Modern Language Association (MLA) style of writing, in-text citations must include the author'slast name and page number of any paraphrased or directly-quoted text. It is essential to give credit to the source of material or literary work in our writing, as it establishes our credibility as a writer.
Student sample: brainly.com/question/26096982
Eagleton foolishly considers Shakespeare “no more valuable than much present-day graffiti” (11).
This is an acceptable citation since the student included the author's last name and the page number in his direct quotation. However, the student should have used an ellipsis (...) at the beginning of his direct quotation. The purpose of adding an ellipsis is to let the reader know that the quoted text is a phrase, or a sub-part of a complete text. The correct formatting is as follows:
Eagleton foolishly considers Shakespeare “... no more valuable than much present-day graffiti” (11).
Student sample: brainly.com/question/26096976
As Eagleton observes, “value” is a transitory word that describes something appreciated by particular people in particular times and places, judged by certain standards for certain reasons (11).
This is not an acceptable citation. The paraphrased text closely resembles the source, despite using different words. Regardless of citing his source, the student essentially plagiarized Eagleton's text. The purpose of paraphrasing text is to convey the author's ideas using your own words. A great way to prevent plagiarism is to ask oneself, "How can I explain my understanding of Eagleton's text to others?"
Student sample: brainly.com/question/26096979
As Eagleton points out, the value of a work of literature changes depending on its audience—literary value is a subjective idea, not a fixed one (11).
This is an acceptable citation. The student succinctly used his own words in expressing how he understood the author's text, without closely resembling the original source. He also provided the page number of the paraphrased text.
Answer:Biographical context, which is formed by the beliefs, education, culture, and experiences of the author. Context of language and form, which helps readers understand the vocabulary and sentence structures of a text as well as its literary form.
Explanation:
It is critical to understand that when a word begins with a vowel sound, you must use an. The letter u is sometimes sounded as the letter y. Try pronouncing these two words out loud and see if you can detect how the u is pronounced differently in each.
We use a before consonant-sounding words and a [n] before vowel-sounding terms.
A [] is used before words that begin with a consonant when spoken aloud, such as house, cat, or peanut. An [n], on the other hand, is used before words that begin with a vowel when spoken aloud, such as onion, orange, or elephant. The definite article an s used in these words even though the word honor does not begin with a vowel in its spelling when we say it. Another example is university or unicorn, both of which are spelled in different ways.
To know more about this article, refer to the link:
Answer:
We use a [ə]before words that when we pronounce them, the sound is the one of a consonant, and we use an [æn] before words that when we pronounce them, the sound is the one of a vowel.
Explanation:
A [ə] is used before words that when we pronounce them, they start with a consonant, for example, a house, a cat, or a peanut.
On the other hand, an [æn] is used before words that when we pronounce them, they start with a vowel, for example, an onion, an orange, or an elephant.
Even though the word honor does not start with a vowel in its spelling when we pronounce it, it does, that is why these words use the definite article an. Another example of this is university or unicorn, they are spelled with a vowel at the beginning, but when we pronounce them, we pronounce a consonant [j].
O a. There was a chance not many people would sign.
b. It was an agreement with King George III.
O c. Those who signed belonged to no country.
O d. Britain viewed those who signed as traitors.
Explanation:
Signing this document was dangerous. To sign the Declaration of Independence meant that the signers were living on borrowed time. But, freedom meant sacrifice, even the sacrifice of their lives. So, even with the threat of death hanging over their heads, they signed this marvelous and bold document.
Answer:
May be television, since they can't handle a phone.
Answer:
projector
Explanation:
use a projector so they don't have a bright screen up to there eyes
Answer:
The main idea of the text 'The Case Against Torture' is that maltreatment is being carried out in the country against the Constitution of the country.
Explanation:
"The Case Against Torture" is a persuasive essay written by Alisa Solomon. The essay was written to bring to light the tortures being carried by the Government against the Constitution of the United States.
In her essay she asserts how the government non-citizens of America in jail and not only just keep them there but also how they torture them to get the information from the suspected criminals. They have used to mean of torture to get the information from them, which is also against the U.S. Constitution and also against thhe UN Convention.
The main critique against torture includes the human rights violations and constitutional breaches that occur during inhumane treatment of detainees, particularly in the context of the war on terror, which has damaged America's global standing and countered the ethical principles it upholds.
The main idea against torture is grounded in the protection of human rights and upholding constitutional principles. Instances such as the indefinite detention and inhumane treatment of suspects at Guantanamo Bay and the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison highlight the challenges faced during the war on terror. The ethical and legal disputes center on balancing national security concerns with individual rights, with critics arguing that such practices not only violate international law and the U.S. Constitution but also harm America's reputation globally and may inadvertently aid terrorist recruitment.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Explanation:
Despite the continuously changing face of crime and the development of cybercrime, the majority of money laundering techniques discovered by law enforcement are still conventional. While cash is steadily losing favor with consumers, it is still one of the primary ways used to launder the profits of crime, according to Europol's newest strategic analysis, 'Why is cash still king?'
Almost all sorts of crime utilize cash to aid money laundering at some point, not only classic crimes that create cash gains, but also dangers posed by emerging technologies such as virtual currencies, where currency is employed as a tool to conceal the unlawful origin of revenues.
In the EU, the use of cash is the most common cause for suspicious transaction reports in the financial system, accounting for almost 30% of all reports. Around a third of all inputs to Europol in the area of money laundering are reports on questionable physical currency transactions.
Despite a small drop in the usage of cash for payments in the EU, demand for large denomination notes not typically used for payments, such as the EUR 500 note, has remained stable. Over 30% of the value of all banknotes in circulation is represented by the EUR 500 note alone (1). This raises issues about why they're being used and if they're tied to illegal activities, both of which should be investigated further.
Linking funds to criminal activity continues to be a difficult task for law enforcement. "Criminals' use of cash continues to be one of the most important impediments to effective investigations and conviction," says Europol Director Rob Wainwright. "It's a danger that hasn't gotten enough international attention or legislative responses." Criminals frequently exploit a fragmented enforcement strategy at national and international levels, as well as varied regulatory regimes throughout EU Member States, by adapting their techniques and routes to take advantage of these gaps. If we are to combat these illegal activities, we must boost our efforts to improve international collaboration and information sharing, as well as build a more harmonised policy among EU Member States regarding cash flows inside the EU."