Answer:
bofa
Explanation:
French Liberals
c.
French Liberties
b.
English Liberties
d.
English Liberals
The correct answer is actually C. French Liberties
b. eldest daughters
c. eldest sons
d. youngest daughters
c. Independent
b. Republican
d. Green
Answer
One who is accountable for the proper administration of the election. office bloc arrangement, indications of offices resemble across the ballot, the contestants of parties for each office are below the headlines.
b. KSFs are often necessary, but not sufficient for competitive advantage.
c. KSFs are often sufficient, but not necessary for competitive advantage.
d. KSFs are neither necessary nor sufficient for competitive advantage.
e. None of these statements is correct.
Answer: (A.) KSFs are both necessary and sufficient for competitive advantage.
Explanation: Key success factor (KSF) is a process whereby the customers access a firm to and gives them a feedback on their strengths, weakness and generally areas they need to improve on. These factors are determined by customers who consume the goods/services of that company and these factors are vital to the optimal company-customer relationship.
Key Success Factors (KSF) are generally areas that a company needs to pay keen attention to, in order to achieve its goals.
KSF if properly used can give a company an added advantage in a very competitive market, as the goods/services they would deliver would effectively match with the demands of their customers/target market .
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The question is not complete, the complete question is in the form of: David is choosing between two exercise routines. In Routine #1, he burns 20 calories walking. He then runs at a rate that burns 10.5 calories per minute. In Routine #2, he burns calories 38 walking. He then runs at a rate that burns 8.5 calories per minute. For what amounts of time spent running will Routine #1 burn at most as many calories as Routine #2? Use for the number of minutes spent running, and solve your inequality for .
Answer:
Let us assume that the number of minutes spent running is t minute. The equation that represents the total calories burnt for routine 1 is given as:
20 + 10.5t
While the total calories burnt for routine 2 is given as:
38 + 8.5t
Since Routine #1 burn at most as many calories as Routine #2, hence it can be represented by the inequality
20 + 10.5t < 38 + 8.5t
Solving the inequality:
10.5t - 8.5t < 38 - 20
2t < 18
t < 9 minutes
For routine 1 to burn at most as many calories as routine 2, the time spent running must be less than 9 minutes
David should run for less than or equal to (W2 - W1) / (R1 - R2) minutes for the calories burned in Routine #1 to be at most equal to that of Routine #2. W1, W2, R1, and R2 represent the number of calories burned walking and running rate in each routine, respectively.
The question doesn't provide specific figures for the amount of calories burned through walking or running in either routine. Therefore, for our purposes, let's denote the number of calories burned walking in Routine #1 and #2 as W1 and W2 respectively, and the rate of calories burned per minute running as R1 and R2 respectively.
If x represents the time (in minutes) David spends running, the total number of calories burned in Routine #1 would be W1 + R1*x, and for Routine #2 it would be W2 + R2*x.
David would burn at most as many calories with Routine #1 as he would with Routine #2 when W1 + R1*x ≤ W2 + R2*x. To solve this inequality for x, you would perform the following steps:
#SPJ3