What was the most important result of the Land Ordinance of 1785?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

The answer is "  It provides an arrangement for the expansion of US borders".

Explanation:

The 1785 New law brought the 1784 resolutions into effect by establishing a framework for the sale and settlement of the property, whereas the 1787 Northwestern New law discussed political interests.  

The New law of 1785 established the land law foundations until the Homestead Bill of 1862 passed, that motivated settlers to have the 13 state governments completely settled, and helps to bring the country cash by the selling of public property


Related Questions

How many countries are there
The Whiskey RebellionA. led to the development of two distinct political groups. B. started a disagreement among supporters of the Federalists. C. unified northern merchants and southern farmers. D. caused the formation of the Democratic Societies.
Charlene typically goes along with what her group of friends wants and asks of her. However, one day she refuses to meet them for smoothies after class. Chances are, Charlene will face little retribution for this as long as she has enough __________.
A common thread that runs through all voluntary associations is ________.
Please give 5 sources of water. I mark brainlest ​

Midlife crisis or transition is naturally accompanied by severe depression.

Answers

The answer for this one is false

Answer:

the person above me is correct

Explanation:

i just did it

Which of the statements best describes comitatus? It made life more bearable by providing companionship. It was closely linked with pagan warriors. It was a curse.

Answers

The answer would be : It made life more bearable by providing companionship

Comitatus refer to Some sort of Friendship Agreement between Germanic King and his Warriors

This Agreement usually state something like : the warrior promised to stayed at the kings' Side no matter what circumstances that may happen

Final answer:

Comitatus describes a relationship between a leader and his followers in early Middle Ages, especially among Germanic tribes. Followers pledged their loyalty to the leader in exchange for protection and shared spoils. Hence, comitatus was closely linked with pagan warriors.

Explanation:

The term comitatus refers to a historical concept that originated during the early Middle Ages, practiced especially among the Germanic tribes. It denotes a relationship between a leader, often a warrior chieftain, and his followers (or 'comites'). These followers would pledge their loyalty to their leader, promising to fight for him in exchange for his protection and the promise of shared spoils from war or conquest. The concept later influenced feudal relationships of vassalage in medieval Europe.

With this in mind, the statement that best describes comitatus from the options given is: it was closely linked with pagan warriors. This is because Germanic tribes during the early Middle Ages, who predominantly practiced this model, were traditionally pagan.

Learn more about comitatus here:

brainly.com/question/1299290

#SPJ12

Six symptoms of intrapersonal conflict

Answers

An intrapersonal conflict is a conflict humans face within themselves between should and want. It usually appears when a persons needs to take a decision, simple or bigger one. It takes place in the person’s mind. Symptoms of it can be: stress, depression, change of mood, restlessness, problems of communication,  low self esteem, anxiety.

Colonists in _____ developed a wide range of industries, such as shipbuilding.the middle colonies
New England
the southern colonies

Answers

I think it’s New England

Answer:

New England

Explanation:

A mutual network of caring, interested others is known as __________ support.a. Moral
b. Social
c. Collective
d. Group

Answers

I believe the answer is 
A. Social

while you were taking this exam, i sideswiped your car in the parking lot, and i caused a lot of damage. forcing me to pay for the damage is a

Answers

While you were taking this exam, your car was sideswiped in the parking lot, resulting in significant damage. Forcing me to pay for the damage is a reasonable course of action, as I am responsible for the incident.

It is important for individuals to take responsibility for their actions, especially when they cause harm or damage to others' property. In this case, compensating you for the damage caused by the sideswipe is the right thing to do.

By paying for the damages, I am acknowledging my mistake and taking the necessary steps to rectify the situation. This not only helps to rebuild trust between us but also sets an example for others to follow when they find themselves in similar situations. Accidents can happen, but taking responsibility and making amends is a crucial part of resolving conflicts and maintaining a healthy and respectful community.

In conclusion, when I sideswiped your car in the parking lot while you were taking the exam, causing a lot of damage, forcing me to pay for the damage is a fair and responsible course of action to take in order to make amends and uphold a sense of accountability within our community.

know more about damage to others' property here: brainly.com/question/30865333

#SPJ11