Answer:
Explanation:
Dumbarton Oaks and Yalta both were the important conferences of the post war world. Dumbarton Oaks was held in 1944 in Washington. In this conference, the delegates from 39 countries met to discuss the United Nations. Out of all these countries five would be selected as permanent members and 11 would be selected as the member of security council. Yalta conference was held in February 1945. Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin met at a Soviet resort on the Black Sea called Yalta and the outcome of conference was that Poland was liberated, Europe was declared Liberated and Germany was divided in to Four zones.
The UN is the institution which is committed to maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relation among nations and promoting social progress and better living standards with human rights. This institution was the outcome of Dumbarton Oaks
The answer is A. I hope this helps. :)
B. The United States was about to go to war with Mexico.
C. Northerners were focused on the political corruption plaguing the nation.
D. Northerners felt the job was done.
9. Why did Lincoln need a military victory before he could announce the emancipation of slaves insouthern states?
A. The South might accept emancipation ifit looked like the North could win the war
B. Union soldiers wouldn't support emancipation if they didn't have a winning record
C. He didn't want the Emancipation Proclamation to look like an act of desperation.
D. The North didn't have a single victory up until this point.
10. ich of the following describes the Radical Republicans' plan for Reconstruction in the South?
A. African Americans shouldn't be trusted with the power of the vote.
B. The federal government should take strong action to ensure African Americans' rights.
C. The federal government should leave African American rights up to the states.
D. Southern states should have an easy transition back into the union.
The women's own choice makes such a man her husband; yet, being so chosen, he is her lord, and she is to be subject to him, yet in a way of liberty, not of bondage