Im sorry, I dont know you're answer. I just want the points!
Natural ingenuity, instinct for what is elegant, a supple mind are their sole hierarchy, and often make of women of the people the equals of the very greatest ladies.
The girl was one of those pretty and charming young creatures who sometimes are born, as if by a slip of fate, into a family of clerks.
She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was unhappy as if she had really fallen from a higher station.
NextReset
The answers are
The girl was one of those pretty and charming young creatures who sometimes are born, as if by a slip or fate, into a family of clerks.
She dressed plainly because she could not dress well,but she was unhappy as if she had really fallen from a higher station.
B. Transitional words and phrases
C. Subject-verb agreement
D. Pronoun-antecedent agreement
1. Flaming carrot always has flippers for when he needs to swim
Kant's issue with Hume does not have to do with what Hume didn't say. Therefore, it is false.
Kant's problem with Hume stems more from the fact that Kant believes what Hume didn't say to be incorrect. Kant and Hume did not always see eye to eye, but when they did, their debates focused mostly on the nature of knowledge and reasoning.
Kant was critical of both Hume's scepticism and his notion that knowledge is restricted to what can be perceived by our senses. Kant argued that knowledge extends beyond this. Kant maintained that there is such a thing as innate knowledge and that reason plays an important part in comprehending the universe.
#SPJ11
FALSE.
Kant's issue with Hume does not have more to do with what Hume didn't say. In fact, Kant's criticism of Hume's philosophy is primarily focused on what Hume did say. Kant disagreed with Hume's skeptical approach to knowledge and causality. Hume argued that knowledge is based solely on sensory experience and that causality is merely a habit of the mind. Kant, on the other hand, believed that knowledge is a combination of sensory experience and innate concepts of the mind. He argued that causality is a necessary condition for our understanding of the world.
Kant's critique of Hume centers around these fundamental differences in their philosophies. He sought to reconcile Hume's empiricism with his own rationalism, ultimately proposing a synthetic approach to knowledge that combined both empirical observation and a priori concepts. Thus, Kant's issue with Hume is not about what Hume didn't say, but rather about the fundamental disagreements in their respective theories of knowledge and causality.
B. belief in one supreme god
C. belief in no god
D. belief in all gods