Concrete is made of an uneven mixture of gravel, sand, and water. It is _____.1.homogenous
2.heterogeneous
3.a solution
4.a solute

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: 2) heterogeneous, because it does not have a uniform texture
Answer 2
Answer: Concrete is made of an uneven mixture of gravel, sand, and water. It is heterogeneous.

Hope I helped : )

Related Questions

I have no misgivings about, or lack of confidence in the cause in which I am engaged, and my courage does not halt or falter. I know how strongly American Civilization now leans on the triumph of the Government and how great a debt we owe to those who went before us through the blood and sufferings of the Revolution. And I am willing—perfectly willing—to lay down all my joys in this life, to help maintain this Government, and to pay that debt. Read this excerpt from a letter by Civil War soldier Sullivan Ballou. Which cause does Ballou support?
During world War 2 which were allied nations
We consider the underlying [error] of the plaintiff's argument to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it. Based on this passage, what was the court's opinion about segregation in the United States? A. It was permitted as long as both races agreed that facilities were of equal quality. B. It was allowed as long as the facilities provided to both races were equal. C. It was illegal because it stripped black citizens of their natural rights. D. It was damaging because it labeled the black race as inferior.
Why were the roads such a vital part of the Empire? Explain.
How was northern society different from southern society?The North was home to antislavery abolitionists, but the South had more European immigrants.The North was an industrial society, while the South featured small farms around numerous large cities.Northern society became more diverse than southern due to heavy immigration through northern ports.Southern society became more diverse than northern due to the South's milder climate.

Imagine you are a farmer in Venezuela. How might you have felt about the changes Chávez brought about?

Answers

The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.  

If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.

If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.  


Answer:

Like many farmers and laborers, I likely would support the changes that Chávez brought about because they helped Venezuela’s poor. As president, Chávez introduced education, healthcare, and labor initiatives to improve the quality of life for the lower classes of Venezuela.

Explanation:a

communism is a political system where all economic and political power rest in the hands of the central government

Answers

Is this a true or false question? If so true! Have a good day! ;-)

What impact did the war have on Indians?

Answers

There was a huge rise in the defense expenditure of the Government of India. There was a sharp increase in the prices of daily commodities. The war drove the demand for industrial goods like jute bags, clothes, rails, and steel.

Explanation:

the Indians died because I don't know the reason bruda

How did the Pope respond to the Seljuk Turks?

Answers

Answer:

Pope Urban made a very public and urgent plea in 1095 to all of Christendom after receiving a letter from the Byzantine Emperor Alexis describing the increasing danger from the Seljuk Turks, Tartars from Asia, who had already conquered the caliphate of Baghdad in 1055 and now were seeking to expand their empire into the Holy Land. All of the history you have heard about the Crusades is so much hogwash:

from Seven Lies About Catholic History, by Diane Moczar

Unprovoked Muslim aggression in the seventh century brought large parts of the southern Byzantine Empire, including Syria, the Holy Land, and Egypt under Arab rule. Christians who survived the conquests found themselves subject to a special poll tax and discriminated against as an inferior class known as dhimmi. Often their churches were destroyed and other harsh conditions imposed. For centuries their complaints had been reaching Rome, but Europe was having its own Dark Age of massive invasion, and nothing could be done to relieve the plight of eastern Christians.

By the eleventh century, under the rule of a new Muslim dynasty, conditions worsened. The Church of the Holy Sepulcher, site of the Crucifixion was destroyed, along with a large number of other churches, and Christian pilgrims were massacred. In 1067 a group of seven thousand peaceful German pilgrims lost two-thirds of their number to Muslim assaults. By this time the popes, including St. Gregory VII, were actively trying to rally support for relief of eastern Christians, though without success. It was not until the very end of the century, in 1095, that Pope Urban's address at Clermont in France met with a response-though not quite the one he had hoped for. But the response was what we now call the First Crusade.

"The general consensus of opinion among medievalists . . . is tha thte Crusades were military expeditions organized by the peoples of Western Christendom, notably the Normans and the French, under the leadership of the Roman Popes, for the recover of the Holy Places from their Muslim masters." This seems to sum up most neatly what the Crusades really were and how their participants actually viewed them. The Crusades were not colonialist or commercial ventures, they were not intended to force Christianity on Jews and Muslims, and they were not the projects of individual warlords. Their primary goal, in addition to the defense of the Eastern Empire, was the recovery of the Holy Land for Christendom, and they acknowledged the leadership of the Popes. As French historian Louis Brehier wrote, 'the popes alone understood the menace of Islam's progress for christian civilization.'"

Explanation:

Who is the 38 president of the U.S.

Answers

gerald ford..............................

Hi there!

The 38th president of the U.S. is Gerald Ford, who was in office between 1974 and 1977. 

Which of the following are reasons why the Nazis were able to gain control in Germany?Choose all that apply:

the expansion of Soviet influence

the world wide economic depression of the 1930's

the appeal of Adolf Hitler to the Germans

German dissatisfaction with the Versailles Treaty

Answers

Answer: D) German dissatisfaction with the Versailles treaty

Explanation: the treaty of Versailles crippled the German economy and military, but most of all, it blamed Germany for starting World War One. The nazi party promised the German people that they would bring the nation out of depression and humiliation