What prevented East Germany from participating in the Marshall Plan, despite being offered economic assistance?A. a lack of support from West Germany
B.the Soviet Union’s refusal to participate
C.the strict conditions of the Marshall plan
D.a lack of support for economic growth in East Germany

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

As the Soviet Union refused to participate in the Marshall Plan, East Germany did not participate in the economic assistance. Hence, Option B is correct.

What is the Marshall Plan?

Another name for the Marshall Plan was the European Recovery Program. This plan was basically a U.S. programme that aimed to provide aid to Western Europe following the devastation of World War II. This plan was enacted in 1948 and provided financial assistance of more than $15 billion.

As East Germany was part of the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union did not welcome the plan. The reason behind not welcoming the plan was that it also encouraged the countries to become part of democracy.

Therefore, Option B, the Soviet Union’s refusal to participate, is correct.

Learn more about Marshall plan from here:

brainly.com/question/22602380

#SPJ2

Answer 2
Answer: The correct answer is B) the Soviet Union's refusal to participate

Related Questions

What kind of transportation was used in the 80's
What can be concluded about the demise of the Knights of Labor?
While consumerism during the 1920s boosted the economy, it also led to
A wealthy plantation owner named George Washington was chosen as the first
Which of these Civil Rights leaders also worked with the organized labor movement to improve economic conditions for African American workers?Rosa Parks Huey Newton Harry T. Moore Philip Randolph

What did John Mitchell tell the Senate about Richard Nixon?

Answers

that he was the reason for the watergate scandal

Which of the following terms refers to the action taken by the United States and Japan to restrict Japanese immigration to the United States in the early 20th century?

Answers

Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be that the US passed a law banning Japanese immigration, since the US government passed the Federal Immigration Act of 1924. 

Final answer:

The term that refers to the action taken by the United States and Japan to restrict Japanese immigration to the United States in the early 20th century is the 'Japanese Exclusion Act'. This was enforced through legislative measures, particularly the Emergency Immigration Act of 1921 and National Origins Act of 1924, and through specific actions like the internment of Japanese during World War II.

Explanation:

  • The action taken by the United States and Japan to restrict Japanese immigration to the United States in the early 20th century is referred to as the Japanese Exclusion Act.
  • In reaction to the surge in Japanese immigration to the US, especially to California and Hawaii, many US citizens and policymakers began to view this as a threat to American homogeneity.
  • This led to the introduction of legislation to limit Japanese immigration. One such significant legislative measure was the Emergency Immigration Act of 1921 and subsequently the National Origins Act of 1924, that particularly limited Asian immigration to the United States by introducing a quota system.
  • Furthermore, racist sentiments towards Japanese immigrants, leading to their relocation and internment during World War II under Executive Order 9066, were another example of the action against Japanese immigration.

Learn more about Japanese Exclusion Act here:

brainly.com/question/3141631

#SPJ12

Which primary source document would give you insight into how the Great Chicago Fire affected working-class families? A.) a letter B.) a newspaper account C.) an essay D.) an immigrant newspaper

Answers

The answer is B. Because most likely the essay may not have all the info you need, and a letter is definitely not going to help, and the newspaper account may not have anything about the fire.


Final answer:

A letter from a member of a working-class family during or shortly after the Great Chicago Fire would provide the most insight into their experiences. This primary source document would reveal firsthand accounts and personal details not typically found in broader newspaper accounts.

Explanation:

To gain insight into how the Great Chicago Fire impacted working-class families, a personal primary source document like a letter would be very valuable. A letter written by a member of a working-class family during or immediately after the fire could provide firsthand accounts and personal anecdotes, revealing the challenges and hardships they experienced. While a newspaper account could also offer perspective on the event, it would likely represent a more general or 'bird's eye' view rather than the intimate details a personal letter could provide.

Learn more about Great Chicago Fire

brainly.com/question/1416697

#SPJ2

Why did president Jefferson send government officials James monroe and Robert Livingston overseas in 1803

Answers

Answer:

A- to negotiate the purchase of the Louisiana Territory from Britain

Why did President Jefferson send government officials James Monroe and Robert Livingston overseas in 1803?: A: to negotiate the purchase of the Louisiana Territory from Britain to try to buy New Orleans and West Florida from France to offer to purchase the Caribbean island of Haiti from France to arrange to buy the Northwest Territory from Britain. C:

Which war claimed the most lives?

Answers

World War II, by far. It claimed over 50 million lives, both military and civilian, from across 30 countries. Some estimates even go as high as 85 million
hello

World War II, by far. It claimed over 50 million lives, both military and civilian, from across 30 countries. Some estimates even go as high as 85 million

What is the most common form of government in the world today?

Answers

The popular form of government appears to some type of republic from an executive form which has a president independent of the legislature to a ceremonial republic where the ministry is subject to the power of the legislature.