Which event is the BEST example of the growing anti-immigrant sentiment that spread throughout the United States in the 1920s?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The event that is the best example of the growing anti-immigrant sentiment that spread throughout the United States in the 1920s would be the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti. Despite worldwide demonstrations in support of their innocence, Italian-born anarchists Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti are executed for murder.
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer: The trial of Sacco and Vanzetti

Explanation:

Bc


Related Questions

Who did many see as the main aggressor during World War I?a. Franceb. Englandc. Germanyd. Austria-Hungary
North and South Korea are divided by a demilitarized zone located at the _____ Parallel. 30th 38th 40th 45th
Abraham Lincoln opposed the Crittenden Compromise because?:A. he opposed the expansion of slavery in the territories. B. it allowed the doctrine of popular sovereignty to be overridden once statehood was achieved. C. its adoption might provoke Kentucky to leave the Union. D. he felt bound by President Buchanan's earlier rejection of it.
Which changes would most likely limit the growth of a plant-eating animal population? Select four options.
What was momentous decision did the framers make at the beginning of the philadelphia convention?

Match the vocabulary word with its meaning. 1. cynicism philosophy that believes true knowledge is not possible 2. inductive reasoning a particular system of thought or doctrine 3. philosophy reaching conclusions based on observation 4. skepticism a means of arriving at truth by questioning, obtaining answers, and criticizing the answers 5. Socratic Method a philosophy that doubts the attitude, beliefs, or character of others 6. syncretism philosophy that attempts to combine different systems of beliefs or practices

Answers

cynicism- philosophy that attempts to combine different systems of beliefs or practices.

inductive reasoning- reaching conclusions based on observation.

philosophy- a particular system of thought or doctrine.

skepticism- philosophy that believes true knowledge is not possible.

Socratic Method- a means of arriving at truth by questioning, obtaining answers and criticizing the answers.

syncretism- a philosophy that doubts the attitude, beliefs, or character of others.

Answer:

1. cynicism

2

reaching conclusions based on observation

2. inductive reasoning

3

a particular system of thought or doctrine

3. philosophy

5

a means of arriving at truth by questioning, obtaining answers, and criticizing the answers

4. skepticism

4

philosophy that believes true knowledge is not possible

5. Socratic Method

1

philosophy that attempts to combine different systems of beliefs or practices

6. syncretism

6

a philosophy that doubts the attitude, beliefs, or character of others

How credible is rummel estimates of japan genocide?

Answers

The credibility of Rummel's estimates of Japanese genocide is disputed. Some historians believe that his estimates are too high, while others believe that they are accurate.

Rummel's estimates are based on a variety of sources, including official Japanese records, Allied war crimes trials, and postwar surveys.

However, some historians have questioned the accuracy of these sources.

For example, they argue that the Japanese government may have underreported the number of people killed during the war, and that the Allied war crimes trials may have been biased against the Japanese.

Other historians have defended Rummel's estimates, arguing that they are based on the best available evidence.

They also argue that Rummel's estimates are consistent with other estimates of Japanese war crimes.

Ultimately, the credibility of Rummel's estimates is a matter of debate.

However, there is no doubt that the Japanese military committed numerous acts of genocide during World War II.

The exact number of people killed is unknown, but it is likely in the millions.

Learn more about World War II

brainly.com/question/7745710

#SPJ11

Final answer:

Rummel's estimates of Japan genocide during World War II, based on his research and analysis of historical data, provide valuable insights into the scale and impact of the atrocities committed by the Japanese government. While debates regarding the accuracy of specific figures exist, Rummel's work contributes to our understanding of these events.

Explanation:

Rudolph J. Rummel, a political scientist, conducted extensive research on democide, which includes genocide, and provided estimates of Japan genocide during World War II. His estimates are based on a thorough analysis of historical data, including government records, eyewitness accounts, and other sources.

Rummel's work focuses on the number of deaths caused by the Japanese government, particularly in relation to the Nanjing Massacre and other atrocities committed by the Imperial Japanese Army. He aimed to shed light on the scale and impact of these events.

While Rummel's estimates have been influential in understanding the magnitude of Japan's wartime atrocities, it is important to note that estimating the exact number of victims in such historical events can be challenging. Different sources may provide varying figures, and debates among scholars regarding the accuracy of specific estimates are not uncommon.

However, Rummel's research and analysis contribute to our understanding of the atrocities committed during World War II and the impact they had on the affected populations.

Learn more about credibility of rummel's estimates of japan genocide here:

brainly.com/question/12445988

#SPJ14

What rights does the Declaration of Independence express? A. The right to remain silent when interrogated by police
B. Legal rights of citizens
C. Human rights of citizens, including life and liberty
D. The right to citizenship

Answers

The Declaration of Independence expresses "C. Human rights of citizens, including life and liberty," since the Founders felt that these liberties had been trampled upon by the British. 

Final answer:

The Declaration of Independence articulates the basic human rights of citizens, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It also asserts the right of the people to change or discard a government that threatens these rights.

Explanation:

The Declaration of Independence of the United States primarily expresses the human rights of citizens, including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The document established these principles as the foundation upon which the United States was built. It asserts that these rights are inherent and unalienable, meaning they cannot be taken away or given up. These fundamental rights are not the only ones expressed in the document. It also declares the right of the people to alter or abolish a government if it becomes destructive of these rights, essentially instituting the concept of popular sovereignty. However, it does not specifically address legal rights of citizens, rights to remain silent when interrogated, or the specifics of citizenship.

Learn more about Declaration of Independence here:

brainly.com/question/33784250

Followers of Muhammad's ___ faith condemned idol worship and were called _____

Answers

Followers of Muhammad's Islamic faith condemned idol worship and were called Muslims. Islam is one of the oldest and most dominant religions in the world and originated from Mecca. Muslims are guided by the Qur'an which is considered to be the final revelation of Allah. Muhammad is known as the "seal of the prophets".

Answer:

monotheistic; Muslim

Explanation:

The 1842 Coal Mines Act forbade the underground employment of _____ in mines.

Answers

The correct answer is that the Coal Mines act prohibited all the children under the age of ten from working underground in Coal Mines.

The Coal Mines Act of 1842  was passed by the United Kingdom Parliament. This act was an acknowledgement to the “Children's employment commission report of 1842” ( which described the horrific condition of the labors). the method of Coal extraction was outdated, hence the workforce including men, women and children, labored in hard conditions. Therefore the parliament of the United Kingdom banned the children under the age of ten, and also to women to go underground in the coal mines to work.

It forbade the employment of boys under the age of 10 yrs, and banned employment of women of any age in the mines.

Which pair of Supreme Court cases demonstrates that the Supreme Court can change an earlier decision?

Answers

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)." The pair of Supreme Court cases demonstrates that the Supreme Court can change an earlier decision is that of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)