The mass extinction may cause the arrival of new species in the new and changing environment.
Further Explanation:
Mass extinction is the phenomenon when there is the extinction of many organisms or the group of an organism from the Earth due to change in environmental condition as it would not allow the survival of these organisms in the new environmental condition. This may cause the appearance of a new organism or the spread of mutant organisms in the prevailing environment that may play new roles. Hence new kind of ecosystem may be formed in the changing environment and those organisms that survive or get adapted to this condition may reproduce more and increase in number.
Therefore mass extinction although causes removal of some organism but may provide a new platform for the arrival of new kind of species and formation of a new ecosystem.
Learn More:
1. Learn more about carbon dioxide brainly.com/question/1213217
2. Learn more about atmosphere brainly.com/question/2037060
3. Learn more about temperature brainly.com/question/1403211
Answer Details:
Grade: Middle school
Chapter: Ecosystem
Subject: Biology
Keywords:
Mass extinction, organism, Earth, environmental, condition, ecosystem, reproduce, mutant, organisms
Ans.
The dominant allele can be defined as the allele, which can express itself in both heterozygous and homozygous conditions. On the other hand, recessive allele can only express itself in homozygous condition (when both the alleles for recessive traits are present. It means presence of one dominant allele can hide the expression of recessive allele.
In given experimental flower, red color is dominant over white color of flower. So, 'if a plant grower wants to produce red flowers only, he should choose both the parent plants having red flowers as they have at least one allele for red color that would transfer to their offspring.'
Lets understand this in a calculative way,
Let the parents genotype be RR and Rr
The offspring’s produced are – RR, Rr, Rr, RR, Thus all the offsprings are white as r is recessive, for producing a red flower the offspring must have “rr” genotype.
Now if parents have Rr and rr genotype , then the offspring would have Rr, rr, rr, Rr giving two white and two red flower. Of the second case may be where both the parent white flower are the carrier with genotype “Rr”
Thus in order to produce red flower the parents with following genotypes is necessary –
a) Both parents having Rr
b) One parents with rr and the other parent with Rr genotype
The factor most often acting as a selecting agent for the survival of a species in a particular location is the
Answer:
interactionism
Explanation:
The dominant perspective in the nature-nurture debate today is interactionism or the biopsychosocial model. This view emphasizes the complex interaction of genetic traits and environmental factors in shaping human behavior and development. Subfields like neuroconstructivism further highlight this interaction, illustrating how experiences can shape neural pathways.
The dominant perspective in the nature-nurture debate today is often referred to as interactionism or the biopsychosocial model. This perspective holds that our identities are formed through a mix of both genetic traits (nature) and environmental influences (nurture). It emphasizes how our genetic underpinnings interact with our surrounding environment in complex ways to shape who we become. Interactionism acknowledges the role of genetic traits inherited from our parents including eye color, height, and personality traits. At the same time, it also considers how these traits are expressed and how we interact with the environment, influenced by our unique experiences and conditions of our environment. Similarly, the biopsychosocial model looks at the complex interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors in determining behavior and development. This model posits that these factors are all interlinked and work together to give rise to the complexity of human behavior.
#SPJ11
Answer:
tropical rain forests have much higher biodiversity than temperate forests.
Explanation: