Answer:
Proof
Explanation:
James Madison significantly influenced the creation of the Constitution, being the 'Father of the Constitution' for his essential contributions. He was not the leader of the Constitutional Convention and did not introduce the New Jersey Plan, but instead created the Virginia Plan. His influence is seen in the Federalist Papers, which helped promote the Constitution.
James Madison significantly influenced the creation of the Constitution. He did not create the Great Compromise, but rather is highly recognized for his valuable contributions, and is often referred to as the 'Father of the Constitution' because he wrote a significant portion of it and played a crucial part in its development and ratification.
Madison played a key role in the Constitutional Convention, however, he was not the one who led the Convention. Rather, George Washington was elected to preside over the Convention. Madison worked on creating and promoting the Virginia Plan, which proposed a bicameral legislative branch giving more populous states greater representation, and not the New Jersey Plan which proposed equal representation for all states regardless of size or population.
Madison's influence is further seen in the Federalist Papers, which he co-authored. These papers were vital in promoting the Constitution and explaining its structures. His impact on the shaping and promoting of the Constitution makes his role in the creation of the Constitution, indelible.
#SPJ2
A different interpretation of historical facts can result from alternate viewpoints, varying sources, and empirical debates. These interpretations can significantly change our understanding of the past, stressing the importance of considering a variety of perspectives and acknowledging the fallibility of our beliefs.
A different interpretation of the facts in history could be the result of alternate lenses or viewpoints. Historical interpretations can drastically change our understanding of past events. For example, considering the evidence from different sources, such as diaries, newspapers, or government records, might provide varying perspectives on a single event. Similarly, our inferences about given facts can vary based on our cultural, social, or personal backgrounds. These deductions provide the pieces of information that we have, with meaning beyond their factual data.
Moreover, differences in interpretation can also arise from empirical debates, where people disagree about what the facts suggest. For instance, two distinct views on the same historical event could be correct based on different interpretations of the same evidence, showing that our perceptions can sometimes misrepresent reality. Therefore, acknowledging a multitude of interpretations, and the potential fallibility of our beliefs, can help us achieve a more nuanced understanding of history.
#SPJ12
A different interpretation of facts refers to the varied ways one can perceive or understand historical events based on the available evidence. Interpretations provide us with different perspectives and understandings of the same event. They help shape our understanding of history and subsequently our world view.
A different interpretation of the facts refers to the unique ways one can view or understand historical events based on the available evidence. When it comes to history, interpretation plays a central role as it allows us to understand the context, consequences, and meanings of past events.
For example, consider a historical event like the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The commonly accepted fact is that it marked the birth of a new nation, the United States. However, a different interpretation might be that it was an act of rebellion against the established order of the time — the British Empire. Both interpretations are derived from the same set of facts but offer different perspectives.
We must remember though that conclusions about what might have been are based on interpretations proposed by the authors of history. Hence, varying perspectives often shape the interpretation of historical 'truths'. These interpretations in turn can influence how we view and interact with the world around us.
#SPJ12
Answer:
the vote goes to the House of Representatives.
Explanation:
If no candidate receives the majority of electoral votes, the vote goes to the House of Representatives. House members choose the new president from among the top three candidates. The Senate elects the vice president from the remaining top two candidates.
Answer: C. non-Christians were an immediate threat to the stability of the church.
Explanation:
By the time Pope Urban called for the first Crusade in 1095, the Muslim armies had occupied a lot of territory both in Europe and in the Holy Land including Jerusalem.
Pope Urban felt it was the Church's duty to protect the land and people of Christendom from non-Christians whom he viewed as threats to the stability of the church. The other crusades as well were also called as Popes believed that they were necessary to protect Christian stability.
The colony outlawed the sale of alcohol.
The colony banned the practice of slavery.
The colony encouraged trade with the Spanish.
The colony allowed more people to own land.
The answer is The colony banned the practice of slavery.
Explanation: Around 1735 and 1750, the Trustees had the decision to ban slavery.
They banned slavery because it was inconsistent with their social and economic intentions.
Georgia was the unique among Britain's American colonies, as it was the only one to attempt to prohibit black slavery as a matter of public policy.
Your Answer Would Be Patricians
Well Thats The Answer Hoped I Helped
Answer: January 31, 1865
Passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865, the 13th amendment abolished slavery in the United States and provides that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States.
Explanation: