(Choice A)
A
crises
(Choice B)
B
crisises
(Choice C)
C
crisis
Answer:
a is the answer
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Simile
Explanation:
The correct answer is simile.
Simile is a figure of speech which compares things together with the use of "as" and "like". Metaphor is its opposite which compares things without the use of "as" and "like".
In the given sentence, we see that the individual compared himself like bleachers.
Therefore, the answer is simile.
The line from Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening And miles to go before I sleep, the effect does this line have on the poem is option B i.e. It creates an accepting tone.
People versus nature, want versus obligation, and mysteries are the three primary subjects of Coming by Woods on a Snowy Evening.The speaker's presence in the typically peaceful scene of the frigid woods addresses the presentation of human considerations into the regular habitat.
Robert Frost is the creator of the sonnet Coming by Woods on a Snowy Evening. American writer Robert Lee Frost was conceived. Prior to being distributed in the United States, his work was first made accessible in England.
Notice that, in line 6, the similar sounding word usage comprises of the reiteration of the phoneme. This phoneme is frequently used to convey non-abrasiveness and quietness, or even a feeling of mitigating.
Other than that, the two refrains of the sonnet diverge from one another. The first portrays an energetic scene, loaded up with development. The subsequent one, then again, underlines how calm, how still the moon is. While the grasses dance and the breeze sings, the moon stays quiet.
In 1923, this sonnet showed up on paper. Delineating the pressure that exists among humanity and nature as well as the qualification between our own longings and our responsibilities was composed.
For more information about tone, refer the following link:
#SPJ2
Answer:
it creats an accepting tone is the correct answer
Explanation:
The man is internally motivated by his loyalty to the dog.
The man is internally motivated by a survival instinct.
The man is externally motivated by the hope of peer recognition.
The man is externally motivated by the urgings of the dog.
Answer: The second opinion
Explanation:
He was comfortable so it couldn’t have been external and him and his dog was doing fine but he knew he was alarmingly cold
The skepticism is characterized by an atittude of doubting, questioning and/or not believing something or someone.
As we can see in “Of Cannibals”, Montaigned used skepticism to justify his arguments on his opinion about clever people. For instance:
1) “They never show you things as they are” – The author also said that clever people “cannot help altering history a little”, and then he says that they never show things as they really are; meaning that since he believes that clever people tend to change facts and information, the consequence of it is that their speech isn’t 100% honest. Therefore, he is skeptical when it comes to the true nature of those facts.
2) (...) And to give credence to their judgement and attract you to it, they are prone to add something to the matter, to strecht it out or amplify it” – Now the author claims that clever people try to convince others by adding details or facts to what actually happened. He believes that once the fact is amplified, it gets more attention and credit. In this case, he is being skeptical in regards to judgements and opinions, suggesting that clever people aren’t really honest in their judgements as they want others to “buy their ideas” and because of it they will tell things in a way that will persuade people to do what they want and believe what they say.
Answer:The skepticism is characterized by an atittude of doubting, questioning and/or not believing something or someone.
As we can see in “Of Cannibals”, Montaigned used skepticism to justify his arguments on his opinion about clever people. For instance:
1) “They never show you things as they are” – The author also said that clever people “cannot help altering history a little”, and then he says that they never show things as they really are; meaning that since he believes that clever people tend to change facts and information, the consequence of it is that their speech isn’t 100% honest. Therefore, he is skeptical when it comes to the true nature of those facts.
2) (...) And to give credence to their judgement and attract you to it, they are prone to add something to the matter, to strecht it out or amplify it” – Now the author claims that clever people try to convince others by adding details or facts to what actually happened. He believes that once the fact is amplified, it gets more attention and credit. In this case, he is being skeptical in regards to judgements and opinions, suggesting that clever people aren’t really honest in their judgements as they want others to “buy their ideas” and because of it they will tell things in a way that will persuade people to do what they want and believe what they say.
Explanation: