Answer:
b. Everyone knows that we now have better medical facilities in the city.
c. You cannot get such an attractive package anywhere else.
d. Man is a wonderful piece of work.
Explanation:
Sentences can undergo a transformation from one form to another. The different forms include assertive, affirmative, negative, exclamatory, and interrogatory.
Which sentence is an example of a generalization?
Answer:
Everyone can see that my opponent is not the best choice to be president.
b. Autobiographical
c. Fiction
d. Satire
b. Animals
c. Automobiles
d. Houses
The following words is an irregular plural noun: Geese. Therefore, the correct option is A.
An object, place, thing, idea, or concept is represented by a noun, a particular kind of word. As they aid in naming and identifying the components of our environment, nouns are a crucial component of language. They are essential for communication since they are the building elements of sentences.
The singular form of noun (geese) is goose, and the plural form is geese. It is not like regular nouns, which basically form their plurals by adding s or es to the singular form, the irregular nouns have unique plural forms that don't follow standard spelling rules.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about noun here:
#SPJ6
Sandy skied into a pine tree and broke her leg.
Sandy skied into a pine tree she broke her leg.
Sandy skied into a pine tree; broke her leg.
Sandy skied into a pine tree, broke her leg.
Answer:
The best way to combine these sentences is as follows: Sandy skied into a pine tree and broke her leg.
Explanation:
As the two independent clauses that make up this compound sentence share the shame subject (the NP "Sandy"), it is possible to ommit the explicit subject of the second clause. That is, to write "and broke her leg" instead of expressing "and she broke her leg" overtly. This is possible when you have a compound sentence with a coordinator such as the one above (and), the absence of said coordinator would make the sentence ungrammatical as the second clause would lack the subject (see 3 & 4). You can only ommit the subject shared by both of the clauses when they have been joined by a coordinator. What is more, in this case, you need a coordinator or special punctuation, otherwise you create a run-on sentence (5).
3. *Sandy skied into a pine; broke her leg.
4. Sandy skied into a pine tree, broke her leg.
5. *Sandy skied into a pine tree she broke her leg
analytical
expository
argumentative
Answer:analytical
Explanation: