The policy adopted by the federal government that imposed tariffs to discourage outsourcing is known as Protectionism policy.
A Protectionism policy are adopted or enforced to protect the domestic workers or industries against external bodies.
Hence, the policy adopted by the federal government that imposed tariffs to discourage outsourcing is known as Protectionism policy.
Read more about Protectionism
Answer:
This is called:
Trade Restriction
Explanation:
Outsourcing to foreign markets can cripple domestic industries, increase local unemployment, and impose trade imbalance. To check excessive outsourcing, the federal government imposes tariffs. Such a trade restriction is considered necessary within the domestic economy. But it may be regarded as a restriction of free trade within the international community.
b. What would be the effect of this purchase on income before income taxes using FIFO method?
Answer:
1. Net income decreases by $3,000
2. The amount of net income would be remains the same.
Explanation:
1. Under LIFO method
(i) Before 8,000 units purchased:
sales = 67,000 units
Cost of goods sold = Quantity × Price
= (66,000 × $13) + (1,000 × $10)
= $858,000 + $10,000
= $868,000
(ii) If 8,000 units purchased at $13 each then,
Cost of goods sold = Quantity × Price
= 67,000 × $13
= $871,000
As the cost of goods increases as a result there will be decrease in the net income before tax under LIFO method.
The amount of net income would be decreased by:
= $871,000 - $868,000
= $3,000
2. Under FIFO method:
(i) Before 8,000 units purchased:
sales = 67,000 units
Cost of goods sold = Quantity × Price
= (16,000 × $10) + (51,000 × $13)
= $160,000 + $663,000
= $823,000
(ii) If 8,000 units purchased at $13 each then,
Cost of goods sold = Quantity × Price
= (16,000 × $10) + (51,000 × $13)
= $160,000 + $663,000
= $823,000
As there will be no change in the cost of goods sold, so, there will be no change in the net income before tax under FIFO method.
The amount of net income would be remains the same.
Missing information:
__?__ Paid the amount due on the note to Locust at the maturity date.
__?__ Paid the amount due on the note to NBR Bank at the maturity date.
Nov. 28 Borrowed $24,000 cash from Fargo Bank by signing a 60-day, 6% interest-bearing note with a face value of $24,000.
Dec. 31 Recorded an adjusting entry for accrued interest on the note to Fargo Bank.
2017
__?__ Paid the amount due on the note to Fargo Bank at the maturity date.
Required: prepare journal entries
Answer:
2016 Apr. 20 Purchased $37,500 of merchandise on credit from Locust, terms n/30.
April 20, 2016, merchandise purchased on account
Dr Merchandise inventory 37,500
Cr Accounts payable 37,500
May 19 Replaced the April 20 account payable to Locust with a 90-day, $35,000 note bearing 8% annual interest along with paying $2,500 in cash.
May 19, 2016, replaced account payable with note payable
Dr Accounts payable 37,500
Cr Cash 2,500
Cr Notes payable 35,000
July 8 Borrowed $54,000 cash from NBR Bank by signing a 120-day, 10% interest-bearing note with a face value of $54,000.
July 8, 2016, borrowed $54,000 from bank
Dr Cash 54,000
Cr Notes payable 54,000
__?__ Paid the amount due on the note to Locust at the maturity date.
August 17, 2016, paid note payable to Locust
Dr Note payable 35,000
Dr Interest expense 690.41 ($35,000 x 8% x 90/365)
Cr Cash 35,690.41
__?__ Paid the amount due on the note to NBR Bank at the maturity date.
November 5, 2016, paid bank's debt.
Dr Notes payable 54,000
Dr Interest expense 1,775.34 ($54,000 x 10% x 1220/365)
Cr Cash 55,775.34
Nov. 28 Borrowed $24,000 cash from Fargo Bank by signing a 60-day, 6% interest-bearing note with a face value of $24,000.
November 28, 2016, borrowed $24,000 from bank
Dr Cash 24,000
Cr Notes payable 24,000
Dec. 31 Recorded an adjusting entry for accrued interest on the note to Fargo Bank.
December 31, 2016, accrued interests on bank debt
Dr interest expense 130.19 (= $24,000 x 6% x 33/365)
Cr Interest payable 130.19
2017
__?__ Paid the amount due on the note to Fargo Bank at the maturity date.
January 27, 2017, paid bank's debt.
Dr Note payable 24,000
Dr Interest payable 130.19
Dr Interest expense 106.52 (= $24,000 x 6% x 27/365)
Cr Cash 24,236.71
Tyrell Co. replaced an account payable with a 90-day, $35,000 note bearing 8% annual interest and borrowed $54,000 from NBR Bank, marking these as short-term liabilities. Singleton Bank also made a $9 million loan to Hank's Auto Supply, adding to their assets.
Tyrell Co. entered into two transactions in 2016 that involved short-term liabilities. In both cases, these liabilities came in the form of interest-bearing notes. On April 20th, Tyrell Co. purchased $37,500 worth of merchandise on credit from Locust. Then, on May 19th, this account payable was replaced with a 90-day, $35,000 note bearing 8% annual interest, along with $2,500 in cash. In a similar transaction on July 8th, Tyrell borrowed $54,000 cash from NBR Bank, signing a 120-day note with a 10% interest rate.
In a parallel example, Singleton Bank made a loan of $9 million to Hank's Auto Supply. The bank records this transaction on the balance sheet as an asset, as it will generate interest income for the bank. The key takeaway from both examples is the process of converting accounts payable or obtaining loans into interest-bearing notes, which become short-term liabilities on the balance sheet.
#SPJ11
b. Overstate net income by $38,000.
c. Understate net income by $38,000.
d. Have no effect on net income.
Answer:
Net profit or net income is overstated by $38000 and option B is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The adjusting entry to be made for accrued and unpaid wages would have been,
Wages expense 38000 Dr
Wages payable 38000 Cr
This entry would record an increase in expenses of $38000 and an increase in liabilities of $38000. As the entry is omitted, the expenses of $38000 are not recorded thus the expenses in income statement are understated. An understatement of expenses means an overstatement of profit by the same amount.
Thus, net profit or net income is overstated by $38000
The cost of direct material used during the period would be $1,24,000.
Inventory is an asset because the company invents money in that, it is the stock used in a particular business it starts with an opening balance of inventory and ends with its closing balance.
The cost of goods sold is the cost of the product which is sold during the year.
The formula for computing cost of goods sold(COGS):
OS= Opening Stock,
CS= Closing Stock.
Computation of cost of direct material:
Given that,
Opening stock of raw material = $27,000,
Closing stock of raw material = $28,000,
Purchases = $72,000 ($1,00,000-$28,000)
Putting the given values in the above formula, we get:
Hence, the cost of direct materials used during the period would be $1,27,000.
Learn more about inventory, refer:
The cost of the direct materials used during the year is $74,000. This was computed by adding the beginning raw materials inventory and purchases, then subtracting the end-year inventory and the indirect materials.
To calculate the cost of direct materials used during the period, you will need to take the beginning raw materials inventory, add the purchases made during the year, and then subtract the end of the year inventory and the indirect materials.
In this case, the calculation would be as follows: $27,000 (beginning inventory) + $100,000 (purchases) - $25,000 (ending inventory) - $28,000 (indirect materials) = $74,000. So the cost of direct materials used during the year is $74,000.
This calculation is part of managerial accounting, where it's crucial to keep track of direct and indirect costs to calculate the cost of goods manufactured and eventually obtain the cost of goods sold.
#SPJ11
Answer:
Just Choose an side.
Explanation:
Would you rather use a store-bought mix, or a homemade mix? (Just choose one).
For homemade: I chose this because I would like to try something new and make different flavors, if it is a success.
For store-bought: I chose this because I want it to be easy for me to make, and has all the steps on the back of the box.
Answer:
d) The views of candidates currently running for office do not necessarily represent the views of all politicians.
Explanation:
The reporter simply transferred the conclusion onto the whole politician cohort. Since only the candidates who are running for high-stake political positions were included in the survey, that does not necessarily mean that all the politicians that exist think the new limit is bad.
To add up, the percentage of politicians that are also the candidates for high positions is significantly smaller than the number of all politicians.