By first dilating and then translating the given coordinates of the rectangle, we obtain the final coordinates as (−35, 32), (−7, 32), (−7, 11), (−35, 11). The correct answer is A.
The process of dilation involves multiplying the x and y coordinates of each vertex of the rectangle by a certain factor. In this case the factor is 7, which gives us the following set of coordinates after dilation: (−35, 42), (−7, 42), (−7, 21), (−35, 21). After the dilation, the rectangle is then translated down 10 units, which involves subtracting 10 from each of the y-coordinates. Following the translation, the final set of coordinates of the rectangle is (−35, 32), (−7, 32), (−7, 11), (−35, 11). Therefore, the correct answer is A.
#SPJ2
12.8 km per hour
51.2 km in 4 hours
Answer:
1 and 1 on edg 2020
Step-by-step explanation:
just did the assignment
next question : Find the following determinant by hand.
answer is : 1
Next question : In mathematics, a pattern may suggest a conclusion, but it is not proof of it. Next you will prove that the determinant of a rotation matrix (CCW about the origin) must be 1. Luckily, there is the general rotation matrix you can use.
Answer : cos^2x + sin^2x
Next question : Using trigonometric identities, this can be simplified to
Answer : 1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Using both the rotation matrices earlier in this lesson and your matrix calculator, find each determinant.: 1 and 1
next question : Find the following determinant by hand.
answer is : 1
Next question : In mathematics, a pattern may suggest a conclusion, but it is not proof of it. Next you will prove that the determinant of a rotation matrix (CCW about the origin) must be 1. Luckily, there is the general rotation matrix you can use.
Answer : cos^2x + sin^2x
Next question : Using trigonometric identities, this can be simplified to
Answer : 1
/next question: In the lesson, you used the following matrices to create reflections
Answer: All these reflections resulted in CONGRUENT figures.
next question: Find the determinant of each of these: answer: - 1
next question: A • At =
a b
c d
where At is the transform of A. answer: a=1 b=0 c=0 d=1
next question: Repeat this process for the other three matrices. The product of a reflection matrix and its transpose is the identity matrix
Choose the correct choice for the matrix after applying the transformation to the triangle: A
The resulting matrix creates an image that is to the original triangle.: not similar
Find the determinant of the rotation matrix.
Det R = 1 which matches the determinant for our other translation matricies
Find the product of the matrix and its transpose: R·Rt is none of the above
Answer:
2 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
We know
Ms. Johnson walks at a rate of 2 miles per hour.
How many miles does she walk in 1 hour?
2 miles
Answer:
They are both 42 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
b. Assume the Investment Company Institute sampled 300 American families to estimate that the percent owning stocks or stock funds was 46% in 2012. What is the p-value for your hypothesis test?
c. At α = .01, what is your conclusion?
Using the z-distribution, as we are working with a proportion, it is found that:
a) ,
b) The p-value is of 0.0075.
c) Since the p-value of the test is of 0.0075 < 0.01 for the left-tailed test, it is found that there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that a smaller proportion of American families own stocks or stock funds in 2012 than 10 years ago.
At the null hypothesis, it is tested if the proportion is still of 53%, that is:
At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if the proportion is now smaller, that is:
Item a:
The hypothesis are:
Item b:
The test statistic is given by:
In which:
In this problem, the parameters are:
.
Hence, the value of the test statistic is given by:
Using a z-distribution calculator, considering a left-tailed test, as we are testing if the proportion is less than a value, with z = -2.43, it is found that the p-value is of 0.0075.
Item c:
Since the p-value of the test is of 0.0075 < 0.01 for the left-tailed test, it is found that there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that a smaller proportion of American families own stocks or stock funds in 2012 than 10 years ago.
More can be learned about the z-distribution at brainly.com/question/26454209
Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
b)
c) So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given we have so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of American families owning stocks or stock funds is significantly less than 0.53 .
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
n=300 represent the random sample taken
estimated proportion of American families owning stocks or stock funds
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
Confidence=99% or 0.99
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value (variable of interest)
Concepts and formulas to use
Part a
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that proportion is less than 0.53 or 53%.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Part b
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
(1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion is significantly different from a hypothesized value .
Calculate the statistic
Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:
Statistical decision
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level provided . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.
Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:
Part c
So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given we have so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of American families owning stocks or stock funds is significantly less than 0.53 .