What basic differences in founders' views led to theestablishment of different political parties?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

The major difference that resulted in political parties was over how much power the Federal Government should have.  the founding fathers were against the formation of poliitical parties. They believed that it would divide the nation causing different groups or parties to fight for their own interest and not for the best interest of the nation. As time went own different leaders viewed the constitution in different ways with Hamilton believing the nation should take a broad view of the constitution with the national government having more power.  On the other hand, Jefferson was in favor of more of a narrow view with the power being in the hands of the people and the individual states.

Hamilton introduced the idea of a government bank. The bank would collect taxes, make loans and issue paper money. Jefferson was againist the government bank.

Jefferson sought a strong relationship with Frane while Hamilton did not

Explanation:


Related Questions

Needs to be done by 5 pm please help ‼️Instructions:1.) Draw the path of entry for Native American Civilizations2.) Draw a circle in the geographical area of these major Native American Civilizations around 1500s. Use a different shade/symbol for each civilization.Aztec/Located in what modern country: _____________________Inca/Located in what modern country:____________________Powhattan/Located in what modern country: ___________________ Iroquois/Located in what modern country:______________Sioux/Located in what modern country: _____________________Apache/Located in what modern country: ____________________
_____ is a characteristic of the Native American paradigm.Choose the best definition for the following terms.A. ReductionismB. RealismC. HolismD. Logical positivism
What was the purpose of the Eighteenth Amendment ?
5.Having access to a major river like the Red River helps an area's economy by
Why did the Founding Fathers feel the need to replace the Articles of Confederation?

Which of the following was a source of tension between English colonists and Native Americans?

Answers

Answer:

The biggest source of conflict between Native Americans and European settlers was the issue of land ownership and land use. Europeans felt land should be privately owned, while Native Americans believed land should by owned and used by everyone.

Explanation:

The source of tension between English colonists and Native Americans was Land disputes.

Sources of tension

Land disputes: When English colonists made their settlements bigger, they sometimes took Native American lands, which caused conflicts about who owned the land and its resources.

Cultural clashes happened when the English colonists and Native Americans didn't understand or agree with each other's beliefs, practices, and ways of living. This caused conflicts and tension between them.

Competition for resources: The English settlers wanted to use the natural resources of the land, like fur, trees, and farmland. This sometimes caused problems with the Native Americans, who had been using those resources in their own ways for a long time.

Read on colonist on brainly.com/question/24571554

#SPJ3

Which of the following were criticisms of Levittowns? Check all of the boxes that apply. Homes were constructed cheaply. Homes were too similar to one another. Homes were expensive and too unique. The communities were overplanned and lacked character.

Answers

The criticism of Levittowns were that:

  • Homes were constructed cheaply.
  • Homes were too similar to one another.
  • The communities were over planned and lacked character.

What were Levittowns?

These were considered the first suburbs where several houses would be built close to each other with the same design thereby lowering construction costs.

People claimed these houses were cheaply built and prone to damage and also that the communities were overplanned in that they looked too urban.

In conclusion, options A, B, and D are correct.

Find out more on Levittowns at brainly.com/question/173381.

I think that it would be,

Homes were constructed cheaply: They were shabby because people didn't want to spend that much money on them. (I think)

Homes were too similar and too unique: They were criticized for being so lookalike and not unique.

(The last one might be true, but I'm not completely sure)

How old was abraham lincoln when he became president

Answers

abraham lincoln was 52  years old when he became president..

…he was elected as President of the United States for his first term? Lincoln was elected to office on November 6, 1860 when he was 51 years old.

. …he was elected as President of the United States for his second term? Lincoln was elected for a second term on November 6, 1864 when he was 55 years old.

Explain one similarity in the role of serfs and vassals in the feudal system between 600 and 1450?

Answers

Answer:

One similarity is that they both owed service to another person of high status. Serfs owed service to lords because they provided them protection and land. Vassals owed service to kings because they provided them land.

Explanation:

Supporters of the Dawes Act said the act would help American Indians to...o keep traditions and customs.
o increase property.
o educate children.
o become farmers

Answers

Answer: D. become farmers.

Explanation: 100% right

Answer:

It’s D

Explanation: just took the test

How were New Federalism and RevenueSharing viewed by the American public
regarding Nixon's domestic agenda?
A. They were well received.
C. They were met with protest.
B. They saved his presidency.
D. They were considered weak

Answers

Answer:

A. They were well received.

Explanation:

The New Federalism and Revenue Sharing viewed by the American public regarding Nixon's domestic agenda were "well received by the public"

This policy was originally approved by Congress in 1972. And by 1976, it was renewed again with no changes to the formula. It was generally believed that it strengthened local autonomy in spending decisions. Hence, people found it as a good policy in terms of governance.