The problem with saying something hurtful during a heated conflict is that you can damage your relationships because you ______. a. Have to let the other person speak b. Won’t win your argument c. Can’t take back what you’ve said d. Shouldn’t try to convince people you’re right

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The problem with saying something hurtful during a heated conflict is that you can damage your relationships because you is letter C, you can't take back what you have said. That is why you think before you speak to avoid someone to get hurt or for you to avoid conflict.
Answer 2
Answer: C. Can't take back what you've said. During a heated conflict, flared tempers often lead people to say things that may not necessarily be true but inflammatory all the same. In most cases each side will continue to say more hurtful things until the emotional damage caused is too much to bear or one party decides to back down thereby reducing the emotional instability in the scenario.

Related Questions

Which was an advantage held by the South over the North at the start of the Civil War? A. It's soldiers and generals believed they were protecting their homes and way of life. B. It had an industrial economy with limitless immigrant labor to produce weapons. C. It's slave population was willing to fight to preserve the plantation system. D. It had a far more extensive network of railroads and telegraph lines.
Which of the following was not a result of World War I and the Treaty of Versailles?Select one:a. The United States and the Europeans joined together in a “League of Nations” designed to foster cooperation and prevent war.b. Germany eventually fell under the control of a Nazi dictatorship led by Adolph Hitler.c. Over seven million soldiers died in battle.d. The map of Europe was substantially changed.
33. Christopher volger identified twelve distinct stages a hero goes through during his fourney,TrueFalse34. Legends are simpler than folk tales and more regional in natureTrueO DescriptionMacBook Air
What nationality were the Boers? 1 29 Portuguese Dutch
Which of the following describes the US trade policy in the 1930s?A: Support efforts to expand trade with Asian markets. B: Open industrial and agricultural markets to free trade with other nations. C: Increase trade with other industrialized countries by lowering import taxes on all products. D: Increase the price of farm products and industrial goods by increasing the taxes on imports.

Who formed a theory termed "scientific socialism" and wrote The Communist Manifesto?

Answers

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles

What nation started world war one and what two
nations escalated the conflict

Answers

The assassination of Franz Ferdinand is what started WW1, which was done by Serbian rebels, but the county was Austria-Hungary. The two nations that escalated the conflict was Russia, who supported Serbia, and Germany, who supported Austria. 
The event that led to the beginning of WW1, the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, was done by Serbian rebels, but the county was Austria-Hungary. The two nations that escalated the conflict was Russia, who supported Serbia, and Germany, who supported Austria. 

Describe the changes the Industrial Revolution brought to the lives of working-class people and middle-class people. How did their experiences of industrialization differ?

Answers

Industrialization led to dramatic increases inliving standards and income for many citizens throughout Europe. The people who benefited most on a relative scale were the working-class people, whose income was raised. the middle-class also experience a rise in income, but not as steep.

Final answer:

The Industrial Revolution brought grueling working conditions for the working-class people while promoting wealth and comfort for the middle class. It highlighted a starker class disparity.

Explanation:

The Industrial Revolution brought about significant socio-economic changes in the lives of both the working class and middle class. The working-class people mainly comprised of the laborers who faced harsh working conditions in the factories. While jobs were plentiful, they were low-paid, insecure, and unhealthy.

On the other side of the spectrum, the middle-class folks thrived, largely due to rapidly growing industries and businesses they owned or were managers in. These new middle-class business owners and managers enjoyed much greater wealth and lived more comfortably.

Thus, their experiences of industrialization were fundamentally different from those of the working class. The Industrial Revolution, in a nutshell, exacerbated the disparity between these two classes.

Learn more about Industrial Revolution here:

brainly.com/question/32362243

#SPJ6

Which best describes Cardenas's greatest accomplishment as president of Mexico? (Points : 1) privatization of foreign-owned Mexican oil companies control of immigration to and from the United States education programs focused on urban areas of Mexico implementation of the rights of the Constitution of 1917

Answers

Cardenas is best known for the nationalisation of (until then) privately own oil.
I remember the pictures of the time of women bringing in chickens so that Mexico can buy its oil. People were very hopeful that this nationalisation will bring Mexico wealth.

The best answer is the first one, though it was more a nationalisation that privatisation
that answer would be of immigration to and from united states education program that is why you see know so many immigrants coming from mexico now to the united states.

How did US leaders think people would respond to a military draft during world war 1

Answers

US leaders were nervous that the imposition of a military draft could meet with strong opposition. However, because they approached the draft in a way that did not play favorites, the country accepted the draft process.

During the Civil War, when Congress enacted a draft to supply soldiers to fight for the Union army, riots broke out in New York City. A provision of the Civil War draft allowed wealthier men to avoid being drafted by paying a fee that would hire a substitute to go to war for them. This was seen as anti-democratic and unfair to lower class working men.

The draft instituted during World War I was carried out with a greater sense of equity and fairness. Writing for the Smithsonian, Annika Lundeberg explains: "President Wilson's Selective Service Act of 1917 differed from the Civil War's conscription act of 1863 in that those who were drafted could neither purchase an exemption nor hire a substitute to take their places. Exemptions and substitutions during the Civil War were unpopular with many, as only the wealthy could afford to evade military service. With the option of substitution off the table, the Selective Service Act was more acceptable to many during the Great War."

US leaders thought that people would oppose to a general military draft during World War I. This was also the reason why they didn't opt for this choice immediately but rather waited to see how the war would progress.

What effect did the federal government desire from the implementation of the Dawes act

Answers

The federal government wanted to assimilate and introduce the natives to the American way of living and to integrate them into the society.
Reduce their responsibility to supply for Native American welfare.