what was the destination of most dust bowl migrants. A. agriculture areas to the north. B. cities find find work. C. California's central valley. D. Kansas city.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: C. California's central valley. More then half a million people fled from Oklahoma and other neighboring states during the Depression. More then 300,000 of these people went to California. Most of these people were farmers or tenant farmers. They came to California in hopes of finding farm work. One of the big draws was cotton. The crop had exploded in size. By 1926, farms in California planted over 170,000 acres of cotton. One magnet was California’s cotton crop, which had explodedin size. In 1926, California farms planted 170,000 acres of cotton. By 1937, this number was went up to 600,000 acres.
Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

Most Dust Bowl migrants moved to California's Central Valley in hope of finding better living conditions and employment opportunities, as their farms had been destroyed by severe dust storms and drought

Explanation:

The Dust Bowl migration, one of the largest migrations in American history, had a majority of migrants moving to California's Central Valley. They moved in hope of finding better living conditions and employment opportunities, as the severe dust storms and drought had destroyed their farms in the Midwestern and Southern Great Plains region. The Central Valley, known for its agricultural prosperity, became a popular destination for these Dust Bowl migrants in the 1930s.

Learn more about Dust Bowl migration here:

brainly.com/question/32836392

#SPJ6


Related Questions

When a government imposes a fine to coerce citizens to follow a law, which technique of enacting domestic policy is it employing?
Which statement best analyzes criticisms of the New Deal?A) The New Deal was denounced for increasing the national debt and reach of the federal government.B) The New Deal was condemned for decreasing the power of the Supreme Court. C) The New Deal was criticized for increasing the size and scope of local government. D)The New Deal was seen as promoting American dependency on the federal government.
Which made up the middle class?merchants, traders, and craftsworkers peasants and serfs knights and clergy noblemen and noblewomen
How did Chinese cultures change durning the warring states period
Complete control of the Sumerian kingdom was a power given to __________.

How did fascist philosophies contribute to the Holocaust? A. Fascism’s use of propaganda helped the Nazis convince Jews that they were racially inferior to other Germans.

B. Fascism’s establishment of a cult of personality led many Jews to support Nazi leaders like Adolf Hitler.

C. Fascism’s promotion of militarism was undermined by Jews refusing to serve in the military for religious reasons.

D. Fascism’s commitment to nationalism led many Germans to believe that Jews had no place in German society.

Answers

Fascist philosophies contributed to the Holocaust in Germany, such that it's commitment to nationalism led many Germans to believe that Jews had no place in German society.

What is Holocaust in Germany?

The event of Holocaust was carried in Germany under the leadership of the dictator Adolf Hitler during the period of the Second World War that led to the mass murder of innocent Jews living in the Germany.

Hence, option D holds true regarding Holocaust in Germany.

Learn more about Holocaust in Germany here:

brainly.com/question/10941465

#SPJ2

D. Fascism's commitment to nationalism led many Germans to believe that Jews had no place in German society.

Why were more Americans able to buy luxury items such as cars in the 1920's

Answers

Mass production techniques reduced manufacturing costs and therefore reduced the prices for consumers.
The standard of living was higher after WWII and the creation of new inventions and advertising allowed many people to live in opulence.

Which were key arguments against government suppression of dissent during world war iA) suppression of dissent decrease that the power of the federal government

B) suppression of dissent has no effect on the government or people

C) suppression of dissent is not healthy in a democracy

D) suppression of dissent is impossible and wastes money

Answers

The key argument against government suppression of dissent during world war i is suppression of dissent is not healthy in a democracy. Thus the correct option is C.

What is government?

A government refers to an administrative system developed to maintain the functioning of any country by maintaining peace and order by implementing laws and legislation of the constitution and providing better facilities to its citizens.

To eliminate revolutionaries, secularists, and liberals who opposed the war, the government, private organizations, and "patriots" launched repressive campaigns. The Sedition Act and federal legislation limited disagreement and encouraged collaboration.

Dissenters were frequently given harsh treatment by the United States during World War I. Standing against the administration or the military machine could be a crime under the Espionage Act (1917), which was modified as the Sedition Act (1918).

Therefore, option C is appropriate.

Learn more about Government, here:

brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ2

I just took the test, and the correct answer is: Suppression of dissent is not healthy in a democracy. (:

Why do citizens register to vote

Answers

It's important to register to vote because otherwise it would be quite easy to vote more than once under different aliases and the government wants to make sure we only vote once.
To have freedom in what they want, to be equal, peer pressure, the excitability in their brains and bodies.

Many southern states tried to limit the effects of radical reconstruction by

Answers

Many southern states tried to limit the effects of radical reconstruction by imposing "Jim Crow" laws, which heavily reduced the civil rights of blacks, especially when it came to voting rights. 

Many southern states tried to limit the effects of radical reconstruction by imposing "Jim Crow" laws

Define political polarization as it applies to the Supreme Court.

Answers

There are no options to arrive at the correct solution. I would answer this question from my research and hope that it comes to your help. Political polarization as it applies to the Supreme Court is when one justice refuses to work with the other justices on the bench. It starts acting like a political institution and it is not good.