Answer:
the value that is missing from the table is 8.
Answer: 8
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
13.50 + 6.50 x ( 3 x s) =
Step-by-step explanation:
I don't know what the options are, however that is how I would write it.
Answer: *for 8* Yes, It is congruent by SAS.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we know that LM and NM are congruent, and that angles LMP and NMP are congruent, then all we need to do is prove that MP is congruent to MP, and we can do that by saying that MP is congruent to MP using the reflexive property.
The SAS congruence theorem states that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
The SAS congruence theorem states that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
To determine if the given triangles are congruent using the SAS congruence theorem, we need to check if the corresponding sides and the included angles are congruent. If they are, we can write a proof.
Unfortunately, you have not provided the information about the sides and angles of the given triangles. Please provide the information so that we can determine if the triangles are congruent using the SAS congruence theorem.
#SPJ2
Answer: 13
Step-by-step explanation: Plug 10 in for x; 10/2=5; 5+8=13
Answer: 6 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helped
Answer:
The smallest possible whole-number length of the unknown side is
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The triangle inequality theorem, states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side
Let
x-----> the length of longest side
Applying the triangle inequality theorem
case A)
Rewrite
case B)
The solution of the third side is the interval------->
but remember that
In an obtuse triangle
Round to a whole number
Answer:
why is there only 5 points?
Step-by-step explanation: