Answer:
Civics is the study of the rights and duties of citizens and of how government works
Explanation:
2. Given this evidence, the researcher should reject the null hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information .
3. Given this evidence, the researcher should accept the alternative hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information . . .
4. Given this evidence, the researchers should reject the alternative hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information .
Answer:
1. False
2.True
3.True
4.false
Explanation:
Given that the difference surpasses the threshold level it means the experiment is highly significant according to statistics a p-value less than 0.05 (p ≤ 0.05) is statistically significant.
This shows that the null hypothesis is less than a 5% probability correct and the alternative is more than 95% correct.
Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis, and accept the alternative hypothesis as the correct hypothesis
The correct answer is letter D
Pseudoscience is any of the various methods, theories and systems, such as astrology, psychokinesis or clairvoyance, considered to have no scientific basis.
Pseudoscience describes any belief system or methodology that tries to gain legitimacy using the traps of science, but does not comply with the rigorous methodology and standards of evidence that are the hallmarks of true science.
Promoters of pseudoscience often adopt the vocabulary of science, describing conjectures as hypotheses, theories or laws, providing "evidence" of testimony of observation and "experts", or even developing what appear to be mathematical models of their ideas.
However, in pseudoscience there is no honest attempt to follow the scientific method, provide falsifiable predictions or develop double-blind experiments.
Student:
While society may broadly appreciate and desire educational objectives that can help people lead healthy lives, the exact approaches necessary to reach these desired outcomes are not well understood. Mandigo and Anderson (2003) highlight the need for educators "to develop ways to foster these skills and understandings across numerous types of activities" (p. 8) as an important step towards making this desire a reality.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
A. Word-for-Word plagiarism
B. Paraphrasing plagiarism
C. This is not plagiarism
Answer: THIS IS NOT PLAGIARISM.
Explanation: Plagiarism is the use of someones literature work without acknowledging the person. It is a theft of knowledge in it's simplest term. But when acknowledged it is assumed to be a borrow of knowledge, which is always acceptable because no one knows everything.
The student has acknowledged the source that was cited to build it's literature work, so therefore it is legal for the student to copy as much information from the book, be it paraphrasing of Word-for-word.
Answer: C. This is not Plagiarism.
Explanation: In the student version, he or she neither copied the original content word for word without enclosing them in a quotation marks nor copied the structure of the statement.
The student kept the original meaning without copying word for word as well as the structure.
Also he cited and enclosed the the statement he copied to show he just borrowed them and it was his or her original idea. So this is not Plagiarism
The Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the issue of how to count enslaved people for representation and taxation purposes in the U.S. It allowed slaveholding states to count three-fifths of their enslaved population toward representation. It lost relevance with the enactment of the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery.
The Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the contentious issue of how to count enslaved people for representation and taxation purposes in the United States. It was decided during the formation of the Constitution in the late 18th century. As a result, each enslaved person was counted as three-fifths of a person for determining the state's population, an important factor for apportioning seats in the House of Representatives and assessing federal taxes.
Slaveholding states sought to count their enslaved population fully to maximize their political power. In contrast, states with few or no enslaved people wanted them not to be counted at all. The Compromise hence represented a precarious balance between states of the North and South. While it did bolster political representation for southern states, it also meant the South had to pay more taxes.
Although this compromise gave slaveholding states some advantage, it also underscored the inhumanity of slavery, treating enslaved individuals as less than a complete person. The Three-Fifths Compromise was eventually rendered moot with the 13th Amendment's ratification in 1865, which abolished slavery throughout the United States.
#SPJ5