Answer:
C.
It was the turning point of the war because it forced General Lee and his army to begin a slow, defensive campaign of retreat to their home country for supplies and a fresh stock of soldiers.
Explanation:
Hope I Helped, Feel free to ask any questions to clarify :)
Have a great day!
More Love, More Peace, Less Hate.
-Aadi x
gathering information.
implementing a solution.
weighing disadvantages.
Answer:
C) implementing a solution.
Explanation:
e2020
Answer:
British
Explanation:
Britishers were Spain's European rivals in America as both were conquering lands to strengthen their colonial power. Spanish settlement in Texas began with missions and presidios. Both intended secure control over the region and spread Christianity among the Native Americans.
After French gave Louisiana to Spain, the capital of Texas shifted to San Antonio, where Spain began to strengthen Texas to protect its Mexican colony. Spain encouraged settlers to buy land and raise cattle. The population settled by Mexican farmers and ranchers.
Answer:
Britishers were Spain's European rivals in America as both were conquering lands to strengthen their colonial power. Spanish settlement in Texas began with missions and presidios. Both intended secure control over the region and spread Christianity among the Native Americans.
After French gave Louisiana to Spain, the capital of Texas shifted to San Antonio, where Spain began to strengthen Texas to protect its Mexican colony. Spain encouraged settlers to buy land and raise cattle. The population settled by Mexican farmers and ranchers.
Explanation:
Answer:
Alexander Hamilton brought out the idea for a new national bank in the United States, but Jefferson strongly opposed it. Hamilton had a powerful stand in the argument, however, because Washington was on his side and Washington was the president of the united states at the time. So, Washington helped Hamilton with his mission against Jefferson. Soon Jefferson came back with the federal government and now there was an even battle.
Explanation:
Answer:
The position of Alexander Hamilton was that he wanted to have a new national bank for the US. Jefferson however wasn't too keen on the idea. He had Washington on his side to defend him. He didn't want the bank because he was scared of the possibility of a financial monopoly. He believed that this would make state banks less important and giving financers more power than they needed. Hamilton thought that with a national bank, that it was a necessity. This was thought because he thought that with the bank there would be an improve and would stabilize the credit. He also wanted a bank so that they could make loans for the government and businesses. Washington was still on Hamilton's side so he gave a helping hand in the matter. Jefferson retaliated with the federal government and gave a fair battle.
Explanation:
Answer:
May 4, 1776
Explanation:
i hope this is what your looking for.
The policy of _______ kept other countries from stopping Hitler early on and resulted in the Munich Agreement.
Also known as D-Day, _______ successfully invaded France by coastline, allowing for the liberation of Paris.
The United States entered World War II after the Japanese attack on _______.
The _______ was a turning point in the war between the United States and Japan and first demonstrated the success of the island-hopping strategy.
To secure an unconditional surrender from Japan, the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of _______ and _______.
Answer:
Treaty of Versailles
Nazi
appeasement
Operation Overlord
Pearl Harbor
Battle of Midway
Hiroshima; Nagasaki
In both the European and Pacific Theaters, a growing desire to increase national power and expand territory contributed to the start of World War II. In Europe, Germany ignored the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, expanding its military and invading other nations. In the Pacific, Japan sought to control more territory, leading to the invasion of China and, eventually, to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
While the Nazi military strategy of blitzkrieg was wildly successful in most of Europe, it failed in both Britain and the Soviet Union. As an island nation, Britain was safe from land attacks and managed to withstand and resist Nazi air assaults. In the Soviet Union, a combination of brutal winters and a willingness to sacrifice Soviet lives combined to defeat the Nazi army.
Answers will vary. On the one hand, students may argue that the bomb was justifiable to end further loss of lives. By dropping a bomb that was so devastating, it showed that the United States and the Allies were willing to annihilate their enemies—forcing them to either be destroyed completely or surrender. Along with this reasoning, students might point to the Potsdam Declaration argue that the Japanese were warned. On the other hand, students may argue that they were not justifiable—that the targeting of civilians is not ethical and that no act of military aggression should be a reason to kill hundreds of thousands of individuals and destroy lands and ecosystems. Along with this reasoning, students might claim that no one nation or person has the right to wield such total power.
Explanation:
Answer:
Treaty of Versailles
Nazi
appeasement
Operation Overlord
Pearl Harbor
Battle of Midway
Hiroshima; Nagasaki
In both the European and Pacific Theaters, a growing desire to increase national power and expand territory contributed to the start of World War II. In Europe, Germany ignored the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, expanding its military and invading other nations. In the Pacific, Japan sought to control more territory, leading to the invasion of China and, eventually, to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
While the Nazi military strategy of blitzkrieg was wildly successful in most of Europe, it failed in both Britain and the Soviet Union. As an island nation, Britain was safe from land attacks and managed to withstand and resist Nazi air assaults. In the Soviet Union, a combination of brutal winters and a willingness to sacrifice Soviet lives combined to defeat the Nazi army.
Answers will vary. On the one hand, students may argue that the bomb was justifiable to end further loss of lives. By dropping a bomb that was so devastating, it showed that the United States and the Allies were willing to annihilate their enemies—forcing them to either be destroyed completely or surrender. Along with this reasoning, students might point to the Potsdam Declaration argue that the Japanese were warned. On the other hand, students may argue that they were not justifiable—that the targeting of civilians is not ethical and that no act of military aggression should be a reason to kill hundreds of thousands of individuals and destroy lands and ecosystems. Along with this reasoning, students might claim that no one nation or person has the right to wield such total power.
Explanation:
PENN
b. stocks
c. interest rates
d. debit cards
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
i believe is C
Explanation:
Answer:
c i got it on edg
Explanation: