Answer:
Option B
118
Step-by-step explanation:
By putting the value of x = 5
= 4 × 25 + 15 + 3
= 100 + 18
= 118 (Ans)
Answer:
58
Step-by-step explanation:
4 × 5 to the power of 2 + 3 × 5 + 3
I believe that n= 2. please correct me if I am wrong.
Answer:
n=2
Step-by-step explanation:
Perimeter = 126 cm, area = 972 cm2
Perimeter = 46 cm, area = 972 cm2
Perimeter = 126 cm, area = 131.25 cm2
Perimeter = 46 cm, area = 131.25 cm2
Perimeter = 126 cm, area = 972 cm2
Perimeter = 46 cm, area = 972 cm2
Perimeter = 126 cm, area = 131.25 cm2
Answer:
Perimeter = 126 cm, area = 972 cm2
Step-by-step explanation:
Rectangle perimeter:
Rectangle area:
When scaled, the perimeter will change by same factor but the area by the square of same factor.
Applying to the given rectangle
Perimeter:
Area:
Correct choice is B
Answer:
Perimeter = 126cm
Area = 972cm^2
Step-by-step explanation:
6*4.5 = 27
8*4.5 = 36
Perimeter = 27*2+36*2= 126 cm
Area = 27*36 = 972 cm^2
Hope this helped!
b. Assume the Investment Company Institute sampled 300 American families to estimate that the percent owning stocks or stock funds was 46% in 2012. What is the p-value for your hypothesis test?
c. At α = .01, what is your conclusion?
Using the z-distribution, as we are working with a proportion, it is found that:
a) ,
b) The p-value is of 0.0075.
c) Since the p-value of the test is of 0.0075 < 0.01 for the left-tailed test, it is found that there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that a smaller proportion of American families own stocks or stock funds in 2012 than 10 years ago.
At the null hypothesis, it is tested if the proportion is still of 53%, that is:
At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if the proportion is now smaller, that is:
Item a:
The hypothesis are:
Item b:
The test statistic is given by:
In which:
In this problem, the parameters are:
.
Hence, the value of the test statistic is given by:
Using a z-distribution calculator, considering a left-tailed test, as we are testing if the proportion is less than a value, with z = -2.43, it is found that the p-value is of 0.0075.
Item c:
Since the p-value of the test is of 0.0075 < 0.01 for the left-tailed test, it is found that there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that a smaller proportion of American families own stocks or stock funds in 2012 than 10 years ago.
More can be learned about the z-distribution at brainly.com/question/26454209
Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
b)
c) So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given we have so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of American families owning stocks or stock funds is significantly less than 0.53 .
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
n=300 represent the random sample taken
estimated proportion of American families owning stocks or stock funds
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
Confidence=99% or 0.99
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value (variable of interest)
Concepts and formulas to use
Part a
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that proportion is less than 0.53 or 53%.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Part b
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
(1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion is significantly different from a hypothesized value .
Calculate the statistic
Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:
Statistical decision
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level provided . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.
Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:
Part c
So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given we have so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of American families owning stocks or stock funds is significantly less than 0.53 .
Answer:
The right answer is vertex
Answer:
$20
Step-by-step explanation:
John=$12
Tony=$24
Eric=$20
multiply 12 by 2 to get Tony's money then subtract 4 for eric's money
Answer:
20
Step-by-step
Tony : 24
Eric : 24 - 4
Answer : 20
Answer: a) 0.8413, b) 0.9987.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that
Mean = 3 pounds
Standard deviation = 0.25 pounds
n = 28 bricks
So, (a) What is the probability that all the bricks in the sample exceed 2.75 pounds?
b) What is the probability that the heaviest brick in the sample exceeds 3.75 pounds?
Hence, a) 0.8413, b) 0.9987.